summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched_fair.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2010-05-06sched: replace migration_thread with cpu_stopTejun Heo
Currently migration_thread is serving three purposes - migration pusher, context to execute active_load_balance() and forced context switcher for expedited RCU synchronize_sched. All three roles are hardcoded into migration_thread() and determining which job is scheduled is slightly messy. This patch kills migration_thread and replaces all three uses with cpu_stop. The three different roles of migration_thread() are splitted into three separate cpu_stop callbacks - migration_cpu_stop(), active_load_balance_cpu_stop() and synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop() - and each use case now simply asks cpu_stop to execute the callback as necessary. synchronize_sched_expedited() was implemented with private preallocated resources and custom multi-cpu queueing and waiting logic, both of which are provided by cpu_stop. synchronize_sched_expedited_count is made atomic and all other shared resources along with the mutex are dropped. synchronize_sched_expedited() also implemented a check to detect cases where not all the callback got executed on their assigned cpus and fall back to synchronize_sched(). If called with cpu hotplug blocked, cpu_stop already guarantees that and the condition cannot happen; otherwise, stop_machine() would break. However, this patch preserves the paranoid check using a cpumask to record on which cpus the stopper ran so that it can serve as a bisection point if something actually goes wrong theree. Because the internal execution state is no longer visible, rcu_expedited_torture_stats() is removed. This patch also renames cpu_stop threads to from "stopper/%d" to "migration/%d". The names of these threads ultimately don't matter and there's no reason to make unnecessary userland visible changes. With this patch applied, stop_machine() and sched now share the same resources. stop_machine() is faster without wasting any resources and sched migration users are much cleaner. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
2010-04-23sched: Fix select_idle_sibling() logic in select_task_rq_fair()Suresh Siddha
Issues in the current select_idle_sibling() logic in select_task_rq_fair() in the context of a task wake-up: a) Once we select the idle sibling, we use that domain (spanning the cpu that the task is currently woken-up and the idle sibling that we found) in our wake_affine() decisions. This domain is completely different from the domain(we are supposed to use) that spans the cpu that the task currently woken-up and the cpu where the task previously ran. b) We do select_idle_sibling() check only for the cpu that the task is currently woken-up on. If select_task_rq_fair() selects the previously run cpu for waking the task, doing a select_idle_sibling() check for that cpu also helps and we don't do this currently. c) In the scenarios where the cpu that the task is woken-up is busy but with its HT siblings are idle, we are selecting the task be woken-up on the idle HT sibling instead of a core that it previously ran and currently completely idle. i.e., we are not taking decisions based on wake_affine() but directly selecting an idle sibling that can cause an imbalance at the SMT/MC level which will be later corrected by the periodic load balancer. Fix this by first going through the load imbalance calculations using wake_affine() and once we make a decision of woken-up cpu vs previously-ran cpu, then choose a possible idle sibling for waking up the task on. Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1270079265.7835.8.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-04-23sched: Pre-compute cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd))Peter Zijlstra
Dave reported that his large SPARC machines spend lots of time in hweight64(), try and optimize some of those needless cpumask_weight() invocations (esp. with the large offstack cpumasks these are very expensive indeed). Reported-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-04-02sched: Add enqueue/dequeue flagsPeter Zijlstra
In order to reduce the dependency on TASK_WAKING rework the enqueue interface to support a proper flags field. Replace the int wakeup, bool head arguments with an int flags argument and create the following flags: ENQUEUE_WAKEUP - the enqueue is a wakeup of a sleeping task, ENQUEUE_WAKING - the enqueue has relative vruntime due to having sched_class::task_waking() called, ENQUEUE_HEAD - the waking task should be places on the head of the priority queue (where appropriate). For symmetry also convert sched_class::dequeue() to a flags scheme. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-04-02sched: Fix TASK_WAKING vs fork deadlockPeter Zijlstra
Oleg noticed a few races with the TASK_WAKING usage on fork. - since TASK_WAKING is basically a spinlock, it should be IRQ safe - since we set TASK_WAKING (*) without holding rq->lock it could be there still is a rq->lock holder, thereby not actually providing full serialization. (*) in fact we clear PF_STARTING, which in effect enables TASK_WAKING. Cure the second issue by not setting TASK_WAKING in sched_fork(), but only temporarily in wake_up_new_task() while calling select_task_rq(). Cure the first by holding rq->lock around the select_task_rq() call, this will disable IRQs, this however requires that we push down the rq->lock release into select_task_rq_fair()'s cgroup stuff. Because select_task_rq_fair() still needs to drop the rq->lock we cannot fully get rid of TASK_WAKING. Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-04-02Merge branch 'linus' into sched/coreIngo Molnar
Merge reason: update to latest upstream Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-11sched: Remove AFFINE_WAKEUPS featureMike Galbraith
Disabling affine wakeups is too horrible to contemplate. Remove the feature flag. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268301890.6785.50.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-11sched: Remove ASYM_GRAN featureMike Galbraith
This features has been enabled for quite a while, after testing showed that easing preemption for light tasks was harmful to high priority threads. Remove the feature flag. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268301675.6785.44.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-11sched: Remove WAKEUP_SYNC featureMike Galbraith
This feature never earned its keep, remove it. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268301591.6785.42.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-11sched: Remove FAIR_SLEEPERS featureMike Galbraith
Our preemption model relies too heavily on sleeper fairness to disable it without dire consequences. Remove the feature, and save a branch or two. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268301520.6785.40.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-11sched: Remove NORMALIZED_SLEEPERMike Galbraith
This feature hasn't been enabled in a long time, remove effectively dead code. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268301447.6785.38.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-11sched: Fix select_idle_sibling()Mike Galbraith
Don't bother with selection when the current cpu is idle. Recent load balancing changes also make it no longer necessary to check wake_affine() success before returning the selected sibling, so we now always use it. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268301369.6785.36.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-11sched: Tweak sched_latency and min_granularityMike Galbraith
Allow LAST_BUDDY to kick in sooner, improving cache utilization as soon as a second buddy pair arrives on scene. The cost is latency starting to climb sooner, the tbenefit for tbench 8 on my Q6600 box is ~2%. No detrimental effects noted in normal idesktop usage. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268301285.6785.34.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-11sched: Cleanup/optimize clock updatesMike Galbraith
Now that we no longer depend on the clock being updated prior to enqueueing on migratory wakeup, we can clean up a bit, placing calls to update_rq_clock() exactly where they are needed, ie on enqueue, dequeue and schedule events. In the case of a freshly enqueued task immediately preempting, we can skip the update during preemption, as the clock was just updated by the enqueue event. We also save an unneeded call during a migratory wakeup by not updating the previous runqueue, where update_curr() won't be invoked. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268301199.6785.32.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-11sched: Remove avg_overlapMike Galbraith
Both avg_overlap and avg_wakeup had an inherent problem in that their accuracy was detrimentally affected by cross-cpu wakeups, this because we are missing the necessary call to update_curr(). This can't be fixed without increasing overhead in our already too fat fastpath. Additionally, with recent load balancing changes making us prefer to place tasks in an idle cache domain (which is good for compute bound loads), communicating tasks suffer when a sync wakeup, which would enable affine placement, is turned into a non-sync wakeup by SYNC_LESS. With one task on the runqueue, wake_affine() rejects the affine wakeup request, leaving the unfortunate where placed, taking frequent cache misses. Remove it, and recover some fastpath cycles. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268301121.6785.30.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-11sched: Remove avg_wakeupMike Galbraith
Testing the load which led to this heuristic (nfs4 kbuild) shows that it has outlived it's usefullness. With intervening load balancing changes, I cannot see any difference with/without, so recover there fastpath cycles. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268301062.6785.29.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-11sched: Implement group scheduler statistics in one structLucas De Marchi
Put all statistic fields of sched_entity in one struct, sched_statistics, and embed it into sched_entity. This change allows to memset the sched_statistics to 0 when needed (for instance when forking), avoiding bugs of non initialized fields. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268275065-18542-1-git-send-email-lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-03-01sched, rcu: Fix rcu_dereference() for RCU-lockdepPaul E. McKenney
Make rcu_dereference() of runqueue data structures be rcu_dereference_sched(). Located-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: dhowells@redhat.com LKML-Reference: <20100228163218.GD6846@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-02-26sched: Fix SCHED_MC regression caused by change in sched cpu_powerSuresh Siddha
On platforms like dual socket quad-core platform, the scheduler load balancer is not detecting the load imbalances in certain scenarios. This is leading to scenarios like where one socket is completely busy (with all the 4 cores running with 4 tasks) and leaving another socket completely idle. This causes performance issues as those 4 tasks share the memory controller, last-level cache bandwidth etc. Also we won't be taking advantage of turbo-mode as much as we would like, etc. Some of the comparisons in the scheduler load balancing code are comparing the "weighted cpu load that is scaled wrt sched_group's cpu_power" with the "weighted average load per task that is not scaled wrt sched_group's cpu_power". While this has probably been broken for a longer time (for multi socket numa nodes etc), the problem got aggrevated via this recent change: | | commit f93e65c186ab3c05ce2068733ca10e34fd00125e | Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> | Date: Tue Sep 1 10:34:32 2009 +0200 | | sched: Restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power | Also with this change, the sched group cpu power alone no longer reflects the group capacity that is needed to implement MC, MT performance (default) and power-savings (user-selectable) policies. We need to use the computed group capacity (sgs.group_capacity, that is computed using the SD_PREFER_SIBLING logic in update_sd_lb_stats()) to find out if the group with the max load is above its capacity and how much load to move etc. Reported-by: Ma Ling <ling.ma@intel.com> Initial-Analysis-by: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> [ -v2: build fix ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # [2.6.32.x, 2.6.33.x] LKML-Reference: <1266970432.11588.22.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-02-16Merge branch 'sched/urgent' into sched/coreThomas Gleixner
Conflicts: kernel/sched.c Necessary due to the urgent fixes which conflict with the code move from sched.c to sched_fair.c Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2010-02-08Merge branch 'sched/urgent' into sched/coreIngo Molnar
Merge reason: Merge dependent fix, update to latest -rc. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-22sched: Extend enqueue_task to allow head queueingThomas Gleixner
The ability of enqueueing a task to the head of a SCHED_FIFO priority list is required to fix some violations of POSIX scheduling policy. Extend the related functions with a "head" argument. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Carsten Emde <cbe@osadl.org> Tested-by: Mathias Weber <mathias.weber.mw1@roche.com> LKML-Reference: <20100120171629.734886007@linutronix.de>
2010-01-21sched: Fix the place where group powers are updatedGautham R Shenoy
We want to update the sched_group_powers when balance_cpu == this_cpu. Currently the group powers are updated only if the balance_cpu is the first CPU in the local group. But balance_cpu = this_cpu could also be the first idle cpu in the group. Hence fix the place where the group powers are updated. Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1264017764.5717.127.camel@jschopp-laptop> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-21sched: Assume *balance is validPeter Zijlstra
Since all load_balance() callers will have !NULL balance parameters we can now assume so and remove a few checks. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-21sched: Remove load_balance_newidle()Peter Zijlstra
The two functions: load_balance{,_newidle}() are very similar, with the following differences: - rq->lock usage - sb->balance_interval updates - *balance check So remove the load_balance_newidle() call with load_balance(.idle = CPU_NEWLY_IDLE), explicitly unlock the rq->lock before calling (would be done by double_lock_balance() anyway), and ignore the other differences for now. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-21sched: Unify load_balance{,_newidle}()Peter Zijlstra
load_balance() and load_balance_newidle() look remarkably similar, one key point they differ in is the condition on when to active balance. So split out that logic into a separate function. One side effect is that previously load_balance_newidle() used to fail and return -1 under these conditions, whereas now it doesn't. I've not yet fully figured out the whole -1 return case for either load_balance{,_newidle}(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-21sched: Add a lock break for PREEMPT=yPeter Zijlstra
Since load-balancing can hold rq->locks for quite a long while, allow breaking out early when there is lock contention. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-21sched: Remove from fwd declsPeter Zijlstra
Move code around to get rid of fwd declarations. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-21sched: Remove rq_iterator from move_one_taskPeter Zijlstra
Again, since we only iterate the fair class, remove the abstraction. Since this is the last user of the rq_iterator, remove all that too. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-21sched: Remove rq_iterator usage from load_balance_fairPeter Zijlstra
Since we only ever iterate the fair class, do away with this abstraction. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-21sched: Remove the sched_class load_balance methodsPeter Zijlstra
Take out the sched_class methods for load-balancing. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-21sched: Move load balance code into sched_fair.cPeter Zijlstra
Straight fwd code movement. Since non of the load-balance abstractions are used anymore, do away with them and simplify the code some. In preparation move the code around. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-21sched: Fix vmark regression on big machinesMike Galbraith
SD_PREFER_SIBLING is set at the CPU domain level if power saving isn't enabled, leading to many cache misses on large machines as we traverse looking for an idle shared cache to wake to. Change the enabler of select_idle_sibling() to SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES, and enable same at the sibling domain level. Reported-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1262612696.15495.15.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-01-17sched: Don't expose local functionsH Hartley Sweeten
kernel/sched: don't expose local functions The get_rr_interval_* functions are all class methods of struct sched_class. They are not exported so make them static. Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <201001132021.53253.hartleys@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-16sched: Remove the cfs_rq dependency from set_task_cpu()Peter Zijlstra
In order to remove the cfs_rq dependency from set_task_cpu() we need to ensure the task is cfs_rq invariant for all callsites. The simple approach is to substract cfs_rq->min_vruntime from se->vruntime on dequeue, and add cfs_rq->min_vruntime on enqueue. However, this has the downside of breaking FAIR_SLEEPERS since we loose the old vruntime as we only maintain the relative position. To solve this, we observe that we only migrate runnable tasks, we do this using deactivate_task(.sleep=0) and activate_task(.wakeup=0), therefore we can restrain the min_vruntime invariance to that state. The only other case is wakeup balancing, since we want to maintain the old vruntime we cannot make it relative on dequeue, but since we don't migrate inactive tasks, we can do so right before we activate it again. This is where we need the new pre-wakeup hook, we need to call this while still holding the old rq->lock. We could fold it into ->select_task_rq(), but since that has multiple callsites and would obfuscate the locking requirements, that seems like a fudge. This leaves the fork() case, simply make sure that ->task_fork() leaves the ->vruntime in a relative state. This covers all cases where set_task_cpu() gets called, and ensures it sees a relative vruntime. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> LKML-Reference: <20091216170518.191697025@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-16sched: Select_task_rq_fair() must honour SD_LOAD_BALANCEPeter Zijlstra
We should skip !SD_LOAD_BALANCE domains. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> LKML-Reference: <20091216170517.653578430@chello.nl> CC: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-14sched: Convert rq->lock to raw_spinlockThomas Gleixner
Convert locks which cannot be sleeping locks in preempt-rt to raw_spinlocks. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-09sched: Update normalized values on user updates via procChristian Ehrhardt
The normalized values are also recalculated in case the scaling factor changes. This patch updates the internally used scheduler tuning values that are normalized to one cpu in case a user sets new values via sysfs. Together with patch 2 of this series this allows to let user configured values scale (or not) to cpu add/remove events taking place later. Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1259579808-11357-4-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ v2: fix warning ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-09sched: Make tunable scaling style configurableChristian Ehrhardt
As scaling now takes place on all kind of cpu add/remove events a user that configures values via proc should be able to configure if his set values are still rescaled or kept whatever happens. As the comments state that log2 was just a second guess that worked the interface is not just designed for on/off, but to choose a scaling type. Currently this allows none, log and linear, but more important it allwos us to keep the interface even if someone has an even better idea how to scale the values. Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1259579808-11357-3-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-09sched: Fix missing sched tunable recalculation on cpu add/removeChristian Ehrhardt
Based on Peter Zijlstras patch suggestion this enables recalculation of the scheduler tunables in response of a change in the number of cpus. It also adds a max of eight cpus that are considered in that scaling. Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1259579808-11357-2-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-09sched: Remove unnecessary RCU exclusionPeter Zijlstra
As Nick pointed out, and realized by myself when doing: sched: Fix balance vs hotplug race the patch: sched: for_each_domain() vs RCU is wrong, sched_domains are freed after synchronize_sched(), which means disabling preemption is enough. Reported-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-09sched: Discard some old bitsPeter Zijlstra
WAKEUP_RUNNING was an experiment, not sure why that ever ended up being merged... Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-09sched: Clean up check_preempt_wakeup()Peter Zijlstra
Streamline the wakeup preemption code a bit, unifying the preempt path so that they all do the same. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-09sched: Move update_curr() in check_preempt_wakeup() to avoid redundant callJupyung Lee
If a RT task is woken up while a non-RT task is running, check_preempt_wakeup() is called to check whether the new task can preempt the old task. The function returns quickly without going deeper because it is apparent that a RT task can always preempt a non-RT task. In this situation, check_preempt_wakeup() always calls update_curr() to update vruntime value of the currently running task. However, the function call is unnecessary and redundant at that moment because (1) a non-RT task can always be preempted by a RT task regardless of its vruntime value, and (2) update_curr() will be called shortly when the context switch between two occurs. By moving update_curr() in check_preempt_wakeup(), we can avoid redundant call to update_curr(), slightly reducing the time taken to wake up RT tasks. Signed-off-by: Jupyung Lee <jupyung@gmail.com> [ Place update_curr() right before the wake_preempt_entity() call, which is the only thing that relies on the updated vruntime ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1258451500-6714-1-git-send-email-jupyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-09sched: Sanitize fork() handlingPeter Zijlstra
Currently we try to do task placement in wake_up_new_task() after we do the load-balance pass in sched_fork(). This yields complicated semantics in that we have to deal with tasks on different RQs and the set_task_cpu() calls in copy_process() and sched_fork() Rename ->task_new() to ->task_fork() and call it from sched_fork() before the balancing, this gives the policy a clear point to place the task. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-09sched: Protect sched_rr_get_param() access to task->sched_classThomas Gleixner
sched_rr_get_param calls task->sched_class->get_rr_interval(task) without protection against a concurrent sched_setscheduler() call which modifies task->sched_class. Serialize the access with task_rq_lock(task) and hand the rq pointer into get_rr_interval() as it's needed at least in the sched_fair implementation. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912090930120.3089@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-11-26Merge branch 'sched/urgent' into sched/coreIngo Molnar
Merge reason: Pick up fixes that did not make it into .32.0 Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-11-24sched: Optimize branch hint in pick_next_task_fair()Tim Blechmann
Branch hint profiling on my nehalem machine showed 90% incorrect branch hints: 15728471 158903754 90 pick_next_task_fair sched_fair.c 1555 Signed-off-by: Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <4B0BBBB1.2050100@klingt.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-11-13sched: More generic WAKE_AFFINE vs select_idle_sibling()Peter Zijlstra
Instead of only considering SD_WAKE_AFFINE | SD_PREFER_SIBLING domains also allow all SD_PREFER_SIBLING domains below a SD_WAKE_AFFINE domain to change the affinity target. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> LKML-Reference: <20091112145610.909723612@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-11-13sched: Cleanup select_task_rq_fair()Peter Zijlstra
Clean up the new affine to idle sibling bits while trying to grok them. Should not have any function differences. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> LKML-Reference: <20091112145610.832503781@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>