From ff6c6fed3a8ab9b0a7b02574e095e905e89421d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:24:21 +0530 Subject: x86: pci-swiotlb.c swiotlb_dma_ops should be static Impact: reduce kernel size a bit, address sparse warning Addresses the problem pointed out by this sparse warning: arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:53:20: warning: symbol 'swiotlb_dma_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? For x86: swiotlb_dma_ops can be static, because it's not used outside of pci-swiotlb.c Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput Acked-by: FUJITA Tomonori LKML-Reference: <1239558861.3938.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c index 34f12e9..221a385 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size, return swiotlb_alloc_coherent(hwdev, size, dma_handle, flags); } -struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = { +static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = { .mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error, .alloc_coherent = x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent, .free_coherent = swiotlb_free_coherent, -- cgit v0.10.2