From 46ed99d1b7c92920ce9e313152522847647aae4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emil Goode Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 20:48:04 +0200 Subject: x86: vsyscall: Use NULL instead 0 for a pointer argument This patch silences the following sparse warning: arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c:250:34: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Signed-off-by: Emil Goode Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1333306084-3776-1-git-send-email-emilgoode@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c index f386dc4..7515cf0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c @@ -216,9 +216,9 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address) current_thread_info()->sig_on_uaccess_error = 1; /* - * 0 is a valid user pointer (in the access_ok sense) on 32-bit and + * NULL is a valid user pointer (in the access_ok sense) on 32-bit and * 64-bit, so we don't need to special-case it here. For all the - * vsyscalls, 0 means "don't write anything" not "write it at + * vsyscalls, NULL means "don't write anything" not "write it at * address 0". */ ret = -EFAULT; @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address) ret = sys_getcpu((unsigned __user *)regs->di, (unsigned __user *)regs->si, - 0); + NULL); break; } -- cgit v0.10.2