From c710f785329aa751e6cf3b901c1cef167ea0648d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:41:18 +0900 Subject: libata: don't whine on spurious IRQ On configurations where IRQ line is shared with a different controller, spurious IRQs may happen continuously. The message was put there primarily for debugging anyway. Kill it. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c index 6411e0c..e3877b6 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c @@ -1816,10 +1816,6 @@ retry: !ap->ops->sff_irq_check(ap)) continue; - if (printk_ratelimit()) - ata_port_printk(ap, KERN_INFO, - "clearing spurious IRQ\n"); - if (idle & (1 << i)) { ap->ops->sff_check_status(ap); ap->ops->sff_irq_clear(ap); -- cgit v0.10.2 From 68b0ddb289220b6d4d865be128939663be34959d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:51:26 +0900 Subject: libata: disable NCQ on Crucial C300 SSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Crucial said, Thank you for contacting us. We know that with our M225 line of SSDs you sometimes need to disable NCQ (native command queuing) to avoid just the type of errors you're seeing. Our recommendation for the M225 is to add libata.force=noncq to your Linux kernel boot options, under the kernel ATA library option. I have sent your feedback to the engineers working on the C300, and asked them to please pass it on to the firmware team. I have been notified that they are in the process of testing and finalizing a new firmware version, that you can expect to see released around the end of April. We’ll keep you posted as to when it will be available for download. So, turn off NCQ on the drive w/ the current firmware revision. Reported in the following bug. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15573 Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reported-by: lethalwp@scarlet.be Reported-by: Luke Macken Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c index 3f6771e..2ab34dc 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c @@ -4354,6 +4354,9 @@ static const struct ata_blacklist_entry ata_device_blacklist [] = { { "HTS541080G9SA00", "MB4OC60D", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, { "HTS541010G9SA00", "MBZOC60D", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, + /* https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15573 */ + { "C300-CTFDDAC128MAG", "0001", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, + /* devices which puke on READ_NATIVE_MAX */ { "HDS724040KLSA80", "KFAOA20N", ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA, }, { "WDC WD3200JD-00KLB0", "WD-WCAMR1130137", ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA }, -- cgit v0.10.2 From 445d211b0da4e9a6e6d576edff85085c2aaf53df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:33:13 +0900 Subject: libata: unlock HPA if device shrunk Some BIOSes don't configure HPA during boot but do so while resuming. This causes harddrives to shrink during resume making libata detach and reattach them. This can be worked around by unlocking HPA if old size equals native size. Add ATA_DFLAG_UNLOCK_HPA so that HPA unlocking can be controlled per-device and update ata_dev_revalidate() such that it sets ATA_DFLAG_UNLOCK_HPA and fails with -EIO when the above condition is detected. This patch fixes the following bug. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15396 Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reported-by: Oleksandr Yermolenko Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c index 2ab34dc..49cffb6 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c @@ -1494,6 +1494,7 @@ static int ata_hpa_resize(struct ata_device *dev) { struct ata_eh_context *ehc = &dev->link->eh_context; int print_info = ehc->i.flags & ATA_EHI_PRINTINFO; + bool unlock_hpa = ata_ignore_hpa || dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_UNLOCK_HPA; u64 sectors = ata_id_n_sectors(dev->id); u64 native_sectors; int rc; @@ -1510,7 +1511,7 @@ static int ata_hpa_resize(struct ata_device *dev) /* If device aborted the command or HPA isn't going to * be unlocked, skip HPA resizing. */ - if (rc == -EACCES || !ata_ignore_hpa) { + if (rc == -EACCES || !unlock_hpa) { ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "HPA support seems " "broken, skipping HPA handling\n"); dev->horkage |= ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA; @@ -1525,7 +1526,7 @@ static int ata_hpa_resize(struct ata_device *dev) dev->n_native_sectors = native_sectors; /* nothing to do? */ - if (native_sectors <= sectors || !ata_ignore_hpa) { + if (native_sectors <= sectors || !unlock_hpa) { if (!print_info || native_sectors == sectors) return 0; @@ -4186,36 +4187,51 @@ int ata_dev_revalidate(struct ata_device *dev, unsigned int new_class, goto fail; /* verify n_sectors hasn't changed */ - if (dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATA && n_sectors && - dev->n_sectors != n_sectors) { - ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "n_sectors mismatch " - "%llu != %llu\n", - (unsigned long long)n_sectors, - (unsigned long long)dev->n_sectors); - /* - * Something could have caused HPA to be unlocked - * involuntarily. If n_native_sectors hasn't changed - * and the new size matches it, keep the device. - */ - if (dev->n_native_sectors == n_native_sectors && - dev->n_sectors > n_sectors && - dev->n_sectors == n_native_sectors) { - ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, - "new n_sectors matches native, probably " - "late HPA unlock, continuing\n"); - /* keep using the old n_sectors */ - dev->n_sectors = n_sectors; - } else { - /* restore original n_[native]_sectors and fail */ - dev->n_native_sectors = n_native_sectors; - dev->n_sectors = n_sectors; - rc = -ENODEV; - goto fail; - } + if (dev->class != ATA_DEV_ATA || !n_sectors || + dev->n_sectors == n_sectors) + return 0; + + /* n_sectors has changed */ + ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "n_sectors mismatch %llu != %llu\n", + (unsigned long long)n_sectors, + (unsigned long long)dev->n_sectors); + + /* + * Something could have caused HPA to be unlocked + * involuntarily. If n_native_sectors hasn't changed and the + * new size matches it, keep the device. + */ + if (dev->n_native_sectors == n_native_sectors && + dev->n_sectors > n_sectors && dev->n_sectors == n_native_sectors) { + ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, + "new n_sectors matches native, probably " + "late HPA unlock, continuing\n"); + /* keep using the old n_sectors */ + dev->n_sectors = n_sectors; + return 0; } - return 0; + /* + * Some BIOSes boot w/o HPA but resume w/ HPA locked. Try + * unlocking HPA in those cases. + * + * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15396 + */ + if (dev->n_native_sectors == n_native_sectors && + dev->n_sectors < n_sectors && n_sectors == n_native_sectors && + !(dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA)) { + ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, + "old n_sectors matches native, probably " + "late HPA lock, will try to unlock HPA\n"); + /* try unlocking HPA */ + dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_UNLOCK_HPA; + rc = -EIO; + } else + rc = -ENODEV; + /* restore original n_[native_]sectors and fail */ + dev->n_native_sectors = n_native_sectors; + dev->n_sectors = n_sectors; fail: ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_ERR, "revalidation failed (errno=%d)\n", rc); return rc; diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h index f8ea71e..b2f2003 100644 --- a/include/linux/libata.h +++ b/include/linux/libata.h @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ enum { ATA_DFLAG_SLEEPING = (1 << 15), /* device is sleeping */ ATA_DFLAG_DUBIOUS_XFER = (1 << 16), /* data transfer not verified */ ATA_DFLAG_NO_UNLOAD = (1 << 17), /* device doesn't support unload */ + ATA_DFLAG_UNLOCK_HPA = (1 << 18), /* unlock HPA */ ATA_DFLAG_INIT_MASK = (1 << 24) - 1, ATA_DFLAG_DETACH = (1 << 24), -- cgit v0.10.2