From b936bf8b785f0fbe083d203049e4da1c56ec788f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:57:31 +0200
Subject: dm cache: avoid conflicting remove_mapping() in mq policy

On sparc32, which includes <linux/swap.h> from <asm/pgtable_32.h>:

drivers/md/dm-cache-policy-mq.c:962:13: error: conflicting types for 'remove_mapping'
include/linux/swap.h:285:12: note: previous declaration of 'remove_mapping' was here

As mq_remove_mapping() already exists, and the local remove_mapping() is
used only once, inline it manually to avoid the conflict.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-cache-policy-mq.c b/drivers/md/dm-cache-policy-mq.c
index dc112a7..4296155 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-cache-policy-mq.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-cache-policy-mq.c
@@ -959,23 +959,21 @@ out:
 	return r;
 }
 
-static void remove_mapping(struct mq_policy *mq, dm_oblock_t oblock)
+static void mq_remove_mapping(struct dm_cache_policy *p, dm_oblock_t oblock)
 {
-	struct entry *e = hash_lookup(mq, oblock);
+	struct mq_policy *mq = to_mq_policy(p);
+	struct entry *e;
+
+	mutex_lock(&mq->lock);
+
+	e = hash_lookup(mq, oblock);
 
 	BUG_ON(!e || !e->in_cache);
 
 	del(mq, e);
 	e->in_cache = false;
 	push(mq, e);
-}
 
-static void mq_remove_mapping(struct dm_cache_policy *p, dm_oblock_t oblock)
-{
-	struct mq_policy *mq = to_mq_policy(p);
-
-	mutex_lock(&mq->lock);
-	remove_mapping(mq, oblock);
 	mutex_unlock(&mq->lock);
 }
 
-- 
cgit v0.10.2