From 8f28e8fa46625310102aea06fac61ba04c8b5b88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 15:52:02 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE After porting this fixlet to UML: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@41791ab52lfMuF2i3V-eTIGRBbDYKQ , I've also added a warning which should refuse compilation with insane values for PREEMPT_ACTIVE... maybe we should simply move PREEMPT_ACTIVE out of architectures using GENERIC_IRQS. Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds diff --git a/include/linux/hardirq.h b/include/linux/hardirq.h index ebc712e..8336dba 100644 --- a/include/linux/hardirq.h +++ b/include/linux/hardirq.h @@ -43,13 +43,17 @@ #define __IRQ_MASK(x) ((1UL << (x))-1) #define PREEMPT_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(PREEMPT_BITS) << PREEMPT_SHIFT) -#define HARDIRQ_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(HARDIRQ_BITS) << HARDIRQ_SHIFT) #define SOFTIRQ_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(SOFTIRQ_BITS) << SOFTIRQ_SHIFT) +#define HARDIRQ_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(HARDIRQ_BITS) << HARDIRQ_SHIFT) #define PREEMPT_OFFSET (1UL << PREEMPT_SHIFT) #define SOFTIRQ_OFFSET (1UL << SOFTIRQ_SHIFT) #define HARDIRQ_OFFSET (1UL << HARDIRQ_SHIFT) +#if PREEMPT_ACTIVE < (1 << (HARDIRQ_SHIFT + HARDIRQ_BITS)) +#error PREEMPT_ACTIVE is too low! +#endif + #define hardirq_count() (preempt_count() & HARDIRQ_MASK) #define softirq_count() (preempt_count() & SOFTIRQ_MASK) #define irq_count() (preempt_count() & (HARDIRQ_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK)) -- cgit v0.10.2