From 7e01aa11e7f7daf23f4484060fc52dddc24beff3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:26:54 +0200 Subject: workqueue: Use normal rcu There is no need for sched_rcu. The undocumented reason why sched_rcu is used is to avoid a few explicit rcu_read_lock()/unlock() pairs by abusing the fact that sched_rcu reader side critical sections are also protected by preempt or irq disabled regions. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 3fafbbb..2751e5a 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -129,11 +129,11 @@ enum { * * PL: wq_pool_mutex protected. * - * PR: wq_pool_mutex protected for writes. Sched-RCU protected for reads. + * PR: wq_pool_mutex protected for writes. RCU protected for reads. * * WQ: wq->mutex protected. * - * WR: wq->mutex protected for writes. Sched-RCU protected for reads. + * WR: wq->mutex protected for writes. RCU protected for reads. * * MD: wq_mayday_lock protected. */ @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ struct worker_pool { atomic_t nr_running ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; /* - * Destruction of pool is sched-RCU protected to allow dereferences + * Destruction of pool is RCU protected to allow dereferences * from get_work_pool(). */ struct rcu_head rcu; @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ struct pool_workqueue { /* * Release of unbound pwq is punted to system_wq. See put_pwq() * and pwq_unbound_release_workfn() for details. pool_workqueue - * itself is also sched-RCU protected so that the first pwq can be + * itself is also RCU protected so that the first pwq can be * determined without grabbing wq->mutex. */ struct work_struct unbound_release_work; @@ -331,14 +331,14 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to, #include #define assert_rcu_or_pool_mutex() \ - rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held() || \ + rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() || \ lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \ - "sched RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held") + "RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held") #define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq) \ - rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held() || \ + rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() || \ lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex), \ - "sched RCU or wq->mutex should be held") + "RCU or wq->mutex should be held") #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP #define assert_manager_or_pool_lock(pool) \ @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to, * @pool: iteration cursor * @pi: integer used for iteration * - * This must be called either with wq_pool_mutex held or sched RCU read + * This must be called either with wq_pool_mutex held or RCU read * locked. If the pool needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the * caller is responsible for guaranteeing that the pool stays online. * @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to, * @pwq: iteration cursor * @wq: the target workqueue * - * This must be called either with wq->mutex held or sched RCU read locked. + * This must be called either with wq->mutex held or RCU read locked. * If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is * responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online. * @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool) * @wq: the target workqueue * @node: the node ID * - * This must be called either with pwq_lock held or sched RCU read locked. + * This must be called either with pwq_lock held or RCU read locked. * If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is * responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online. * @@ -645,8 +645,8 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *get_work_pwq(struct work_struct *work) * @work: the work item of interest * * Pools are created and destroyed under wq_pool_mutex, and allows read - * access under sched-RCU read lock. As such, this function should be - * called under wq_pool_mutex or with preemption disabled. + * access under RCU read lock. As such, this function should be + * called under wq_pool_mutex or inside of a rcu_read_lock() region. * * All fields of the returned pool are accessible as long as the above * mentioned locking is in effect. If the returned pool needs to be used @@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ static void put_pwq_unlocked(struct pool_workqueue *pwq) { if (pwq) { /* - * As both pwqs and pools are sched-RCU protected, the + * As both pwqs and pools are RCU protected, the * following lock operations are safe. */ spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock); @@ -1205,6 +1205,7 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork, if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))) return 0; + rcu_read_lock(); /* * The queueing is in progress, or it is already queued. Try to * steal it from ->worklist without clearing WORK_STRUCT_PENDING. @@ -1243,10 +1244,12 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork, set_work_pool_and_keep_pending(work, pool->id); spin_unlock(&pool->lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); return 1; } spin_unlock(&pool->lock); fail: + rcu_read_unlock(); local_irq_restore(*flags); if (work_is_canceling(work)) return -ENOENT; @@ -1327,6 +1330,8 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq, if (unlikely(wq->flags & __WQ_DRAINING) && WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_chained_work(wq))) return; + + rcu_read_lock(); retry: if (req_cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND) cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); @@ -1383,10 +1388,8 @@ retry: /* pwq determined, queue */ trace_workqueue_queue_work(req_cpu, pwq, work); - if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&work->entry))) { - spin_unlock(&pwq->pool->lock); - return; - } + if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&work->entry))) + goto out; pwq->nr_in_flight[pwq->work_color]++; work_flags = work_color_to_flags(pwq->work_color); @@ -1402,7 +1405,9 @@ retry: insert_work(pwq, work, worklist, work_flags); +out: spin_unlock(&pwq->pool->lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); } /** @@ -2832,14 +2837,14 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr) might_sleep(); - local_irq_disable(); + rcu_read_lock(); pool = get_work_pool(work); if (!pool) { - local_irq_enable(); + rcu_read_unlock(); return false; } - spin_lock(&pool->lock); + spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); /* see the comment in try_to_grab_pending() with the same code */ pwq = get_work_pwq(work); if (pwq) { @@ -2866,10 +2871,11 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr) else lock_map_acquire_read(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map); lock_map_release(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map); - + rcu_read_unlock(); return true; already_gone: spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); return false; } @@ -3192,7 +3198,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev, const char *delim = ""; int node, written = 0; - rcu_read_lock_sched(); + get_online_cpus(); + rcu_read_lock(); for_each_node(node) { written += scnprintf(buf + written, PAGE_SIZE - written, "%s%d:%d", delim, node, @@ -3200,7 +3207,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev, delim = " "; } written += scnprintf(buf + written, PAGE_SIZE - written, "\n"); - rcu_read_unlock_sched(); + rcu_read_unlock(); + put_online_cpus(); return written; } @@ -3567,7 +3575,7 @@ static void rcu_free_pool(struct rcu_head *rcu) * put_unbound_pool - put a worker_pool * @pool: worker_pool to put * - * Put @pool. If its refcnt reaches zero, it gets destroyed in sched-RCU + * Put @pool. If its refcnt reaches zero, it gets destroyed in RCU * safe manner. get_unbound_pool() calls this function on its failure path * and this function should be able to release pools which went through, * successfully or not, init_worker_pool(). @@ -3614,8 +3622,8 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool) del_timer_sync(&pool->idle_timer); del_timer_sync(&pool->mayday_timer); - /* sched-RCU protected to allow dereferences from get_work_pool() */ - call_rcu_sched(&pool->rcu, rcu_free_pool); + /* RCU protected to allow dereferences from get_work_pool() */ + call_rcu(&pool->rcu, rcu_free_pool); } /** @@ -3728,7 +3736,7 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work) put_unbound_pool(pool); mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex); - call_rcu_sched(&pwq->rcu, rcu_free_pwq); + call_rcu(&pwq->rcu, rcu_free_pwq); /* * If we're the last pwq going away, @wq is already dead and no one @@ -4442,7 +4450,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq) struct pool_workqueue *pwq; bool ret; - rcu_read_lock_sched(); + rcu_read_lock(); + preempt_disable(); if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND) cpu = smp_processor_id(); @@ -4453,7 +4462,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq) pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu)); ret = !list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works); - rcu_read_unlock_sched(); + preempt_enable(); + rcu_read_unlock(); return ret; } @@ -4479,16 +4489,15 @@ unsigned int work_busy(struct work_struct *work) if (work_pending(work)) ret |= WORK_BUSY_PENDING; - local_irq_save(flags); + rcu_read_lock() pool = get_work_pool(work); if (pool) { - spin_lock(&pool->lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->lock, flags); if (find_worker_executing_work(pool, work)) ret |= WORK_BUSY_RUNNING; - spin_unlock(&pool->lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, flags); } - local_irq_restore(flags); - + rcu_read_unlock(); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_busy); @@ -4941,16 +4950,16 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void) * nr_active is monotonically decreasing. It's safe * to peek without lock. */ - rcu_read_lock_sched(); + rcu_read_lock(); for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) { WARN_ON_ONCE(pwq->nr_active < 0); if (pwq->nr_active) { busy = true; - rcu_read_unlock_sched(); + rcu_read_unlock(); goto out_unlock; } } - rcu_read_unlock_sched(); + rcu_read_unlock(); } out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex); -- cgit v0.10.2