From af8161f6ad494f440905a3660147c9086f789e4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:03:10 -0800 Subject: rcu: Don't activate RCU core on NO_HZ_FULL CPUs Whenever a CPU receives a scheduling-clock interrupt, RCU checks to see if the RCU core needs anything from this CPU. If so, RCU raises RCU_SOFTIRQ to carry out any needed processing. This approach has worked well historically, but it is undesirable on NO_HZ_FULL CPUs. Such CPUs are expected to spend almost all of their time in userspace, so that scheduling-clock interrupts can be disabled while there is only one runnable task on the CPU in question. Unfortunately, raising any softirq has the potential to wake up ksoftirqd, which would provide the second runnable task on that CPU, preventing disabling of scheduling-clock interrupts. What is needed instead is for RCU to leave NO_HZ_FULL CPUs alone, relying on the grace-period kthreads' quiescent-state forcing to do any needed RCU work on behalf of those CPUs. This commit therefore refrains from raising RCU_SOFTIRQ on any NO_HZ_FULL CPUs during any grace periods that have been in effect for less than one second. The one-second limit handles the case where an inappropriate workload is running on a NO_HZ_FULL CPU that features lots of scheduling-clock interrupts, but no idle or userspace time. Reported-by: Mike Galbraith Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Tested-by: Mike Galbraith Tested-by: Frederic Weisbecker Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c index 32618b3..ee4de3f 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c @@ -2658,6 +2658,10 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) /* Check for CPU stalls, if enabled. */ check_cpu_stall(rsp, rdp); + /* Is this CPU a NO_HZ_FULL CPU that should ignore RCU? */ + if (rcu_nohz_full_cpu(rsp)) + return 0; + /* Is the RCU core waiting for a quiescent state from this CPU? */ if (rcu_scheduler_fully_active && rdp->qs_pending && !rdp->passed_quiesce) { diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h index 52be957..7d71c06 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h @@ -564,6 +564,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_report_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int isidle, unsigned long maxj); static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void); static void rcu_sysidle_init_percpu_data(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp); +static bool rcu_nohz_full_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp); #endif /* #ifndef RCU_TREE_NONCORE */ diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h index 511e6b4..22232f8 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h @@ -2803,3 +2803,23 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_init_percpu_data(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp) } #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE */ + +/* + * Is this CPU a NO_HZ_FULL CPU that should ignore RCU so that the + * grace-period kthread will do force_quiescent_state() processing? + * The idea is to avoid waking up RCU core processing on such a + * CPU unless the grace period has extended for too long. + * + * This code relies on the fact that all NO_HZ_FULL CPUs are also + * CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPUs. + */ +static bool rcu_nohz_full_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL + if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()) && + (!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp) || + ULONG_CMP_LT(jiffies, ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_start) + HZ))) + return 1; +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */ + return 0; +} -- cgit v0.10.2