From 4b96b1a10cb00c867103b21f0f2a6c91b705db11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 23:52:04 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix the spurious unlock_cpu_hotplug false warnings

Cpu-hotplug locking has a minor race case caused because of setting the
variable "recursive" to NULL *after* releasing the cpu_bitmask_lock in the
function unlock_cpu_hotplug,instead of doing so before releasing the
cpu_bitmask_lock.

This was the cause of most of the recent false spurious lock_cpu_unlock
warnings.

This should fix the problem reported by Martin Lorenz reported in
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/29/127.

Thanks to Srinivasa DS for pointing it out.

Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 663c920..272254f 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ void unlock_cpu_hotplug(void)
 		recursive_depth--;
 		return;
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
 	recursive = NULL;
+	mutex_unlock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unlock_cpu_hotplug);
 
-- 
cgit v0.10.2