diff options
author | Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> | 2016-04-12 13:51:55 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> | 2016-04-18 09:35:50 (GMT) |
commit | 537d3b10086ffae30efbc7c66777c0a08b58d3e6 (patch) | |
tree | 702d96c2d45b4fde270e6512721ad368b82cdfe6 | |
parent | 510650e8b2ab965931b35e9813467439d4df0b9c (diff) | |
download | linux-537d3b10086ffae30efbc7c66777c0a08b58d3e6.tar.xz |
drm/i915: Adjust size of PIPE_CONTROL used for gen8 render seqno write
We started to use PIPE_CONTROL to write render ring seqno in order to
combat seqno write vs interrupt generation problems. This was introduced
by commit 7c17d377374d ("drm/i915: Use ordered seqno write interrupt
generation on gen8+ execlists").
On gen8+ size of PIPE_CONTROL with Post Sync Operation should be
6 dwords. When we're using older 5-dword variant it's possible to
observe inconsistent values written by PIPE_CONTROL with Post
Sync Operation from user batches, resulting in rendering corruptions.
v2: Fix BAT failures
v3: Comments on alignment and thrashing high dword of seqno (Chris)
v4: Updated commit msg (Mika)
Testcase: igt/gem_pipe_control_store_loop/*-qword-write
Issue: VIZ-7393
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460469115-26002-1-git-send-email-michal.winiarski@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit ce81a65c79d6012a384563caf76d47e28947a347)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c index 48b612d..5c6080f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c @@ -1913,15 +1913,18 @@ static int gen8_emit_request_render(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request) struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf = request->ringbuf; int ret; - ret = intel_logical_ring_begin(request, 6 + WA_TAIL_DWORDS); + ret = intel_logical_ring_begin(request, 8 + WA_TAIL_DWORDS); if (ret) return ret; + /* We're using qword write, seqno should be aligned to 8 bytes. */ + BUILD_BUG_ON(I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX & 1); + /* w/a for post sync ops following a GPGPU operation we * need a prior CS_STALL, which is emitted by the flush * following the batch. */ - intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(5)); + intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6)); intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, (PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB | PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL | @@ -1929,7 +1932,10 @@ static int gen8_emit_request_render(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request) intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, hws_seqno_address(request->ring)); intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0); intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, i915_gem_request_get_seqno(request)); + /* We're thrashing one dword of HWS. */ + intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0); intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_USER_INTERRUPT); + intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_NOOP); return intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(request); } |