From 68da336a14e16c2de95e987f3200995b707d7038 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michel Lespinasse Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:21:58 -0700 Subject: x86: access_error API cleanup access_error() already takes error_code as an argument, so there is no need for an additional write flag. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse Acked-by: Rik van Riel Cc: Nick Piggin Acked-by: Wu Fengguang Cc: Ying Han Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: "H. Peter Anvin" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index 9b2345c..7d90ceb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -919,9 +919,9 @@ spurious_fault(unsigned long error_code, unsigned long address) int show_unhandled_signals = 1; static inline int -access_error(unsigned long error_code, int write, struct vm_area_struct *vma) +access_error(unsigned long error_code, struct vm_area_struct *vma) { - if (write) { + if (error_code & PF_WRITE) { /* write, present and write, not present: */ if (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))) return 1; @@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ retry: * we can handle it.. */ good_area: - if (unlikely(access_error(error_code, write, vma))) { + if (unlikely(access_error(error_code, vma))) { bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address); return; } -- cgit v0.10.2