From de8c33290f1c8fdd037b6e3d43ea888928f21e8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Grumbach Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:55:26 +0300 Subject: iwlwifi: dvm: prevent an out of bounds access commit 0b0f934e92a8eaed2e6c48a50eae6f84661f74f3 upstream. iwlagn_check_ratid_empty takes the tid as a parameter, but it doesn't check that it is not IWL_TID_NON_QOS. Since IWL_TID_NON_QOS = 8 and iwl_priv::tid_data is an array with 8 entries, accessing iwl_priv::tid_data[IWL_TID_NON_QOS] is a bad idea. This happened in iwlagn_rx_reply_tx. Since iwlagn_check_ratid_empty is relevant only to check whether we can open A-MPDU, this flow is irrelevant if tid is IWL_TID_NON_QOS. Call iwlagn_check_ratid_empty only inside the if (tid != IWL_TID_NON_QOS) a few lines earlier in the function. Reported-by: Seraphime Kirkovski Tested-by: Seraphime Kirkovski Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c index 4b97371..838946d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c @@ -1190,11 +1190,11 @@ void iwlagn_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rx_cmd_buffer *rxb) next_reclaimed; IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d\n", next_reclaimed); + iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid); } iwl_trans_reclaim(priv->trans, txq_id, ssn, &skbs); - iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid); freed = 0; /* process frames */ -- cgit v0.10.2