From aeb6641f8ebdd61939f462a8255b316f9bfab707 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:29:44 +0100 Subject: lpfc: fix misleading indentation gcc-6 complains about the indentation of the lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array() call in lpfc_online(), which clearly doesn't look right: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_online': drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2880:3: warning: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Wmisleading-indentation] lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2863:2: note: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not if (vports != NULL) ^~ Looking at the patch that introduced this code, it's clear that the behavior is correct and the indentation is wrong. This fixes the indentation and adds curly braces around the previous if() block for clarity, as that is most likely what caused the code to be misindented in the first place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Fixes: 549e55cd2a1b ("[SCSI] lpfc 8.2.2 : Fix locking around HBA's port_list") Reviewed-by: Sebastian Herbszt Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c index a544366..f57d02c 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c @@ -2860,7 +2860,7 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba) } vports = lpfc_create_vport_work_array(phba); - if (vports != NULL) + if (vports != NULL) { for (i = 0; i <= phba->max_vports && vports[i] != NULL; i++) { struct Scsi_Host *shost; shost = lpfc_shost_from_vport(vports[i]); @@ -2877,7 +2877,8 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba) } spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock); } - lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports); + } + lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports); lpfc_unblock_mgmt_io(phba); return 0; -- cgit v0.10.2