From 9eb59573d4b86f347e6cd04f47a4c2082009fa58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andi Kleen Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:18:27 +0200 Subject: [CPUFREQ] Don't take semaphore in cpufreq_quick_get() I don't see any reason to take an expensive lock in cpufreq_quick_get() Reading policy->cur is a single atomic operation and after the lock is dropped again the state could change any time anyways. So don't take the lock in the first place. This also makes this function interrupt safe which is useful for some code of mine. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Signed-off-by: Dave Jones diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index e027052..f7b9d6f 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1111,12 +1111,7 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get(unsigned int cpu) unsigned int ret_freq = 0; if (policy) { - if (unlikely(lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu))) - return ret_freq; - ret_freq = policy->cur; - - unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu); cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); } -- cgit v0.10.2