From 4e9de11c237724140c0ae14ead598c7fbc2847bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:41:16 -0700
Subject: xfs: don't unconditionally clear the reflink flag on zero-block files

commit cc6f77710a6de6210f9feda7cd53e2f5ee7a7e69 upstream.

If we have speculative cow preallocations hanging around in the cow
fork, don't let a truncate operation clear the reflink flag because if
we do then there's a chance we'll forget to free those extents when we
destroy the incore inode.

Reported-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index 9e795ab..fe9a9a1 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -1632,10 +1632,12 @@ xfs_itruncate_extents(
 		goto out;
 
 	/*
-	 * Clear the reflink flag if we truncated everything.
+	 * Clear the reflink flag if there are no data fork blocks and
+	 * there are no extents staged in the cow fork.
 	 */
-	if (ip->i_d.di_nblocks == 0 && xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip)) {
-		ip->i_d.di_flags2 &= ~XFS_DIFLAG2_REFLINK;
+	if (xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip) && ip->i_cnextents == 0) {
+		if (ip->i_d.di_nblocks == 0)
+			ip->i_d.di_flags2 &= ~XFS_DIFLAG2_REFLINK;
 		xfs_inode_clear_cowblocks_tag(ip);
 	}
 
-- 
cgit v0.10.2