From bcf08df3b23b3d13bf8c4ad6bd744a6ad30015fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Molnar Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:11:10 +0200 Subject: sched: Fix cpupri build on !CONFIG_SMP MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This build bug: In file included from kernel/sched.c:1765: kernel/sched_rt.c: In function ‘has_pushable_tasks’: kernel/sched_rt.c:1069: error: ‘struct rt_rq’ has no member named ‘pushable_tasks’ kernel/sched_rt.c: In function ‘pick_next_task_rt’: kernel/sched_rt.c:1084: error: ‘struct rq’ has no member named ‘post_schedule’ Triggers because both pushable_tasks and post_schedule are SMP-only fields. Move pushable_tasks() to the SMP section and #ifdef the post_schedule use. Cc: Gregory Haskins Cc: Peter Zijlstra LKML-Reference: <20090729150422.17691.55590.stgit@dev.haskins.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c index f365e66..3d4020a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c @@ -136,6 +136,11 @@ static void dequeue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) plist_del(&p->pushable_tasks, &rq->rt.pushable_tasks); } +static inline int has_pushable_tasks(struct rq *rq) +{ + return !plist_head_empty(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks); +} + #else static inline void enqueue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) @@ -1064,11 +1069,6 @@ static struct task_struct *_pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq) return p; } -static inline int has_pushable_tasks(struct rq *rq) -{ - return !plist_head_empty(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks); -} - static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq) { struct task_struct *p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq); @@ -1077,11 +1077,13 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq) if (p) dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p); +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* * We detect this state here so that we can avoid taking the RQ * lock again later if there is no need to push */ rq->post_schedule = has_pushable_tasks(rq); +#endif return p; } -- cgit v0.10.2