From 12aaa0855b39b5464db953fedf399fa91ee365ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:05:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] i386 / desc_empty macro is incorrect

Chuck Ebbert noticed that the desc_empty macro is incorrect.  Fix it.

Thankfully, this is not used as a security check, but it can falsely
overwrite TLS segments with carefully chosen base / limits.  I do not
believe this is an issue in practice, but it is a kernel bug.

Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>

[ x86-64 had the same problem, and the same fix. Linus ]

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

diff --git a/include/asm-i386/processor.h b/include/asm-i386/processor.h
index 5d06e6b..d0d8b01 100644
--- a/include/asm-i386/processor.h
+++ b/include/asm-i386/processor.h
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct desc_struct {
 };
 
 #define desc_empty(desc) \
-		(!((desc)->a + (desc)->b))
+		(!((desc)->a | (desc)->b))
 
 #define desc_equal(desc1, desc2) \
 		(((desc1)->a == (desc2)->a) && ((desc1)->b == (desc2)->b))
diff --git a/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h b/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h
index 106f666..85549e6 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
 #define ID_MASK		0x00200000
 
 #define desc_empty(desc) \
-               (!((desc)->a + (desc)->b))
+               (!((desc)->a | (desc)->b))
 
 #define desc_equal(desc1, desc2) \
                (((desc1)->a == (desc2)->a) && ((desc1)->b == (desc2)->b))
-- 
cgit v0.10.2