From b197367ed1ba81b0d26f7e7f76f61731ac6e5842 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Gruenbacher Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 23:12:33 +0100 Subject: selinux: Inode label revalidation performance fix Commit 5d226df4 has introduced a performance regression of about 10% in the UnixBench pipe benchmark. It turns out that the call to inode_security in selinux_file_permission can be moved below the zero-mask test and that inode_security_revalidate can be removed entirely, which brings us back to roughly the original performance. Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher Acked-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Paul Moore diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index 40e071a..f8110cf 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -273,11 +273,6 @@ static int __inode_security_revalidate(struct inode *inode, return 0; } -static void inode_security_revalidate(struct inode *inode) -{ - __inode_security_revalidate(inode, NULL, true); -} - static struct inode_security_struct *inode_security_novalidate(struct inode *inode) { return inode->i_security; @@ -3277,19 +3272,19 @@ static int selinux_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask) { struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); struct file_security_struct *fsec = file->f_security; - struct inode_security_struct *isec = inode_security(inode); + struct inode_security_struct *isec; u32 sid = current_sid(); if (!mask) /* No permission to check. Existence test. */ return 0; + isec = inode_security(inode); if (sid == fsec->sid && fsec->isid == isec->sid && fsec->pseqno == avc_policy_seqno()) /* No change since file_open check. */ return 0; - inode_security_revalidate(inode); return selinux_revalidate_file_permission(file, mask); } @@ -3595,7 +3590,6 @@ static int selinux_file_open(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred) * new inode label or new policy. * This check is not redundant - do not remove. */ - inode_security_revalidate(file_inode(file)); return file_path_has_perm(cred, file, open_file_to_av(file)); } -- cgit v0.10.2