diff options
author | Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> | 2008-03-08 02:55:58 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> | 2008-04-17 14:42:34 (GMT) |
commit | 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff (patch) | |
tree | 19c0b0cf314d4394ca580c05b86cdf874ce0a167 /arch/m32r | |
parent | e48b3deee475134585eed03e7afebe4bf9e0dba9 (diff) | |
download | linux-fsl-qoriq-64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff.tar.xz |
Generic semaphore implementation
Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C
implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and
extensibility. Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep
warning. Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the
unlikely() was unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/m32r')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/m32r/kernel/Makefile | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/m32r/kernel/m32r_ksyms.c | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c | 185 |
3 files changed, 1 insertions, 191 deletions
diff --git a/arch/m32r/kernel/Makefile b/arch/m32r/kernel/Makefile index e97e26e..09200d4 100644 --- a/arch/m32r/kernel/Makefile +++ b/arch/m32r/kernel/Makefile @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ extra-y := head.o init_task.o vmlinux.lds obj-y := process.o entry.o traps.o align.o irq.o setup.o time.o \ - m32r_ksyms.o sys_m32r.o semaphore.o signal.o ptrace.o + m32r_ksyms.o sys_m32r.o signal.o ptrace.o obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smp.o smpboot.o obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) += module.o diff --git a/arch/m32r/kernel/m32r_ksyms.c b/arch/m32r/kernel/m32r_ksyms.c index 41a4c95..e6709fe 100644 --- a/arch/m32r/kernel/m32r_ksyms.c +++ b/arch/m32r/kernel/m32r_ksyms.c @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/string.h> -#include <asm/semaphore.h> #include <asm/processor.h> #include <asm/uaccess.h> #include <asm/checksum.h> @@ -22,10 +21,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_fpu); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ioremap); EXPORT_SYMBOL(iounmap); EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_thread); -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down); -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible); -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up); -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_trylock); /* Networking helper routines. */ /* Delay loops */ diff --git a/arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c deleted file mode 100644 index 940c2d3..0000000 --- a/arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c +++ /dev/null @@ -1,185 +0,0 @@ -/* - * linux/arch/m32r/semaphore.c - * orig : i386 2.6.4 - * - * M32R semaphore implementation. - * - * Copyright (c) 2002 - 2004 Hitoshi Yamamoto - */ - -/* - * i386 semaphore implementation. - * - * (C) Copyright 1999 Linus Torvalds - * - * Portions Copyright 1999 Red Hat, Inc. - * - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or - * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License - * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version - * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. - * - * rw semaphores implemented November 1999 by Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> - */ -#include <linux/sched.h> -#include <linux/err.h> -#include <linux/init.h> -#include <asm/semaphore.h> - -/* - * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter: - * The "count" variable is decremented for each process - * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping" - * variable is a count of such acquires. - * - * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can - * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up - * needs to do something only if count was negative before - * the increment operation. - * - * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected - * by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head. - * - * Note that these functions are only called when there is - * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the - * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The - * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h> - * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls. - */ - -/* - * Logic: - * - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go - * from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up. - * - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we - * (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure - * that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that - * we cannot lose wakeup events. - */ - -asmlinkage void __up(struct semaphore *sem) -{ - wake_up(&sem->wait); -} - -asmlinkage void __sched __down(struct semaphore * sem) -{ - struct task_struct *tsk = current; - DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); - unsigned long flags; - - tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; - spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); - add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); - - sem->sleepers++; - for (;;) { - int sleepers = sem->sleepers; - - /* - * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't - * playing, because we own the spinlock in - * the wait_queue_head. - */ - if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) { - sem->sleepers = 0; - break; - } - sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */ - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); - - schedule(); - - spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); - tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; - } - remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); - wake_up_locked(&sem->wait); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); - tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; -} - -asmlinkage int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem) -{ - int retval = 0; - struct task_struct *tsk = current; - DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); - unsigned long flags; - - tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; - spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); - add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); - - sem->sleepers++; - for (;;) { - int sleepers = sem->sleepers; - - /* - * With signals pending, this turns into - * the trylock failure case - we won't be - * sleeping, and we* can't get the lock as - * it has contention. Just correct the count - * and exit. - */ - if (signal_pending(current)) { - retval = -EINTR; - sem->sleepers = 0; - atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count); - break; - } - - /* - * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't - * playing, because we own the spinlock in - * wait_queue_head. The "-1" is because we're - * still hoping to get the semaphore. - */ - if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) { - sem->sleepers = 0; - break; - } - sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */ - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); - - schedule(); - - spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); - tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; - } - remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); - wake_up_locked(&sem->wait); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); - - tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; - return retval; -} - -/* - * Trylock failed - make sure we correct for - * having decremented the count. - * - * We could have done the trylock with a - * single "cmpxchg" without failure cases, - * but then it wouldn't work on a 386. - */ -asmlinkage int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem) -{ - int sleepers; - unsigned long flags; - - spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); - sleepers = sem->sleepers + 1; - sem->sleepers = 0; - - /* - * Add "everybody else" and us into it. They aren't - * playing, because we own the spinlock in the - * wait_queue_head. - */ - if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers, &sem->count)) { - wake_up_locked(&sem->wait); - } - - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); - return 1; -} |