summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched.c89
1 files changed, 78 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index deb5ac8..dd1a146 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -464,11 +464,15 @@ struct rt_rq {
struct rt_prio_array active;
unsigned long rt_nr_running;
#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
- int highest_prio; /* highest queued rt task prio */
+ struct {
+ int curr; /* highest queued rt task prio */
+ int next; /* next highest */
+ } highest_prio;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
unsigned long rt_nr_migratory;
int overloaded;
+ struct plist_head pushable_tasks;
#endif
int rt_throttled;
u64 rt_time;
@@ -1607,21 +1611,42 @@ static inline void update_shares_locked(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+
/*
- * double_lock_balance - lock the busiest runqueue, this_rq is locked already.
+ * fair double_lock_balance: Safely acquires both rq->locks in a fair
+ * way at the expense of forcing extra atomic operations in all
+ * invocations. This assures that the double_lock is acquired using the
+ * same underlying policy as the spinlock_t on this architecture, which
+ * reduces latency compared to the unfair variant below. However, it
+ * also adds more overhead and therefore may reduce throughput.
*/
-static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
+static inline int _double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
+ __releases(this_rq->lock)
+ __acquires(busiest->lock)
+ __acquires(this_rq->lock)
+{
+ spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
+ double_rq_lock(this_rq, busiest);
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+#else
+/*
+ * Unfair double_lock_balance: Optimizes throughput at the expense of
+ * latency by eliminating extra atomic operations when the locks are
+ * already in proper order on entry. This favors lower cpu-ids and will
+ * grant the double lock to lower cpus over higher ids under contention,
+ * regardless of entry order into the function.
+ */
+static int _double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
__releases(this_rq->lock)
__acquires(busiest->lock)
__acquires(this_rq->lock)
{
int ret = 0;
- if (unlikely(!irqs_disabled())) {
- /* printk() doesn't work good under rq->lock */
- spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
- BUG_ON(1);
- }
if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&busiest->lock))) {
if (busiest < this_rq) {
spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
@@ -1634,6 +1659,22 @@ static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
return ret;
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT */
+
+/*
+ * double_lock_balance - lock the busiest runqueue, this_rq is locked already.
+ */
+static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
+{
+ if (unlikely(!irqs_disabled())) {
+ /* printk() doesn't work good under rq->lock */
+ spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
+ BUG_ON(1);
+ }
+
+ return _double_lock_balance(this_rq, busiest);
+}
+
static inline void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
__releases(busiest->lock)
{
@@ -2445,6 +2486,8 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
/* Want to start with kernel preemption disabled. */
task_thread_info(p)->preempt_count = 1;
#endif
+ plist_node_init(&p->pushable_tasks, MAX_PRIO);
+
put_cpu();
}
@@ -2585,6 +2628,12 @@ static void finish_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
struct mm_struct *mm = rq->prev_mm;
long prev_state;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ int post_schedule = 0;
+
+ if (current->sched_class->needs_post_schedule)
+ post_schedule = current->sched_class->needs_post_schedule(rq);
+#endif
rq->prev_mm = NULL;
@@ -2603,7 +2652,7 @@ static void finish_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
finish_arch_switch(prev);
finish_lock_switch(rq, prev);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (current->sched_class->post_schedule)
+ if (post_schedule)
current->sched_class->post_schedule(rq);
#endif
@@ -2984,6 +3033,16 @@ next:
pulled++;
rem_load_move -= p->se.load.weight;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+ /*
+ * NEWIDLE balancing is a source of latency, so preemptible kernels
+ * will stop after the first task is pulled to minimize the critical
+ * section.
+ */
+ if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
+ goto out;
+#endif
+
/*
* We only want to steal up to the prescribed amount of weighted load.
*/
@@ -3030,9 +3089,15 @@ static int move_tasks(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
sd, idle, all_pinned, &this_best_prio);
class = class->next;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+ /*
+ * NEWIDLE balancing is a source of latency, so preemptible
+ * kernels will stop after the first task is pulled to minimize
+ * the critical section.
+ */
if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && this_rq->nr_running)
break;
-
+#endif
} while (class && max_load_move > total_load_moved);
return total_load_moved > 0;
@@ -8201,11 +8266,13 @@ static void init_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, struct rq *rq)
__set_bit(MAX_RT_PRIO, array->bitmap);
#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
- rt_rq->highest_prio = MAX_RT_PRIO;
+ rt_rq->highest_prio.curr = MAX_RT_PRIO;
+ rt_rq->highest_prio.next = MAX_RT_PRIO;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
rt_rq->rt_nr_migratory = 0;
rt_rq->overloaded = 0;
+ plist_head_init(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks, &rq->lock);
#endif
rt_rq->rt_time = 0;