summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/swiotlb.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2010-08-26x86, swiotlb: Simplify SWIOTLB pci_swiotlb_detect routine.Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
In 'pci_swiotlb_detect' we used to do two different things: a). If user provided 'iommu=soft' or 'swiotlb=force' we would set swiotlb=1 and return 1 (and forcing pci-dma.c to call pci_swiotlb_init() immediately). b). If 4GB or more would be detected and if user did not specify iommu=off, we would set 'swiotlb=1' and return whatever 'a)' figured out. We simplify this by splitting a) and b) in two different routines. CC: Fujita Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> LKML-Reference: <1282845485-8991-5-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2009-12-15x86: Split swiotlb initialization into two stagesFUJITA Tomonori
The commit f4780ca005404166cc40af77ef0e86132ab98a81 moves swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem(). It's supposed to fix a bug that the commit 75f1cdf1dda92cae037ec848ae63690d91913eac introduced, we initialize SWIOTLB right after dma32_free_bootmem so we wrongly steal memory area allocated for GART with broken BIOS earlier. However, the above commit introduced another problem, which likely breaks machines with huge amount of memory. Such a box use the majority of DMA32_ZONE so there is no memory for swiotlb. With this patch, the x86 IOMMU initialization sequence are: 1. We set swiotlb to 1 in the case of (max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN && !no_iommu). If swiotlb usage is forced by the boot option, we go to the step 3 and finish (we don't try to detect IOMMUs). 2. We call the detection functions of all the IOMMUs. The detection function sets x86_init.iommu.iommu_init to the IOMMU initialization function (so we can avoid calling the initialization functions of all the IOMMUs needlessly). 3. We initialize swiotlb (and set dma_ops to swiotlb_dma_ops) if swiotlb is set to 1. 4. If the IOMMU initialization function doesn't need swiotlb (e.g. the initialization is sucessful) then sets swiotlb to zero. 5. If we find that swiotlb is set to zero, we free swiotlb resource. Reported-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Reported-by: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> LKML-Reference: <20091215204729A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Tested-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-11-15swiotlb: Remove duplicate swiotlb_force extern declarationsFUJITA Tomonori
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: tony.luck@intel.com LKML-Reference: <1258199198-16657-4-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-11-11swiotlb: Remove the swiotlb variable usageFUJITA Tomonori
POWERPC doesn't expect it to be used. This fixes the linux-next build failure reported by Stephen Rothwell: lib/swiotlb.c: In function 'setup_io_tlb_npages': lib/swiotlb.c:114: error: 'swiotlb' undeclared (first use in this function) Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: peterz@infradead.org LKML-Reference: <20091112000258F.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-12-28swiotlb: replace architecture-specific swiotlb.h with linux/swiotlb.hFUJITA Tomonori
Impact: cleanup This replaces architecture-specific swiotlb.h (X86 and IA64) with linux/swiotlb.h. Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-10-23x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guardsH. Peter Anvin
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since: a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless. b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-23x86, um: ... and asm-x86 moveAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>