summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2012-11-20mfd: Only unregister platform devices allocated by the mfd coreCharles Keepax
mfd_remove_devices would iterate over all devices sharing a parent with an mfd device regardless of whether they were allocated by the mfd core or not. This especially caused problems when the device structure was not contained within a platform_device, because to_platform_device is used on each device pointer. This patch defines a device_type for mfd devices and checks this is present from mfd_remove_devices_fn before processing the device. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Tested-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2012-09-15mfd: core: Push irqdomain mapping out into devicesMark Brown
Currently the MFD core supports remapping MFD cell interrupts using an irqdomain but only if the MFD is being instantiated using device tree and only if the device tree bindings use the pattern of registering IPs in the device tree with compatible properties. This will be actively harmful for drivers which support non-DT platforms and use this pattern for their DT bindings as it will mean that the core will silently change remapping behaviour and it is also limiting for drivers which don't do DT with this particular pattern. There is also a potential fragility if there are interrupts not associated with MFD cells and all the cells are omitted from the device tree for some reason. Instead change the code to take an IRQ domain as an optional argument, allowing drivers to take the decision about the parent domain for their interrupts. The one current user of this feature is ab8500-core, it has the domain lookup pushed out into the driver. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2012-07-08mfd: Make MFD core code Device Tree and IRQ domain awareLee Jones
During Device Tree enablement of the ab8500 and db8500-prcmu drivers, a decision was made to omit registration through the MFD API and use Device Tree directly. However, because MFD devices have a different address space and the ab8500 and db8500 both use I2C to communicate, this causes issues with address translation during execution of of_platform_populate(). So the solution is to make the MFD core aware of Device Tree and have it assign the correct node pointers instead. To make this work the MFD core also needs to be awere of IRQ domains, as Device Tree insists on IRQ domain compatibility. So, instead of providing an irq-base via platform code, in the DT case we simply look up the IRQ domain and map to the correct virtual IRQ. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2012-03-06mfd: Fix ACPI conflict checkJean Delvare
The code is currently always checking the first resource of every device only (several times.) This has been broken since the ACPI check was added in February 2010 in commit 91fedede0338eb6203cdd618d8ece873fdb7c22c. Fix the check to run on each resource individually, once. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2012-03-06mfd: Fix kcalloc parameters swappedAxel Lin
The first parameter should be "number of elements" and the second parameter should be "element size". Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-10-31mfd: Add module.h to the implicit drivers/mfd usersPaul Gortmaker
With the pending module.h cleanup, these files will fail to compile, unless they explicitly call out the include of this file. [omap-usb-host addition courtesy of Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@ti.com>] Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2011-05-26mfd: Add platform data pointer backSamuel Ortiz
Now that we have a way to pass MFD cells down to the sub drivers, we can gradually get rid of mfd_data by putting the platform pointer back in place. Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-04-12mfd: Fetch cell pointer from platform_device->mfd_cellSamuel Ortiz
In order for MFD drivers to fetch their cell pointer but also their platform data one, an mfd cell pointer is added to the platform_device structure. That allows all MFD sub devices drivers to be MFD agnostic, unless they really need to access their MFD cell data. Most of them don't, especially the ones for IPs used by both MFD and non MFD SoCs. Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-26mfd: Add mfd_clone_cell(), convert cs5535-mfd/olpc-xo1 to itAndres Salomon
Replace mfd_shared_platform_driver_register with mfd_clone_cell. The former was called by an mfd client, and registered both a platform driver and device. The latter is called by an mfd driver, and registers only a platform device. The downside of this is that mfd drivers need to be modified whenever new clients are added that share a cell; the upside is that it fits Linux's driver model better. It's also simpler. This also converts cs5535-mfd/olpc-xo1 from the old API. cs5535-mfd now creates the olpc-xo1-{acpi,pms} devices, while olpc-xo1 binds to them via platform drivers. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd: Rename mfd_shared_cell_{en,dis}able to drop the "shared" partAndres Salomon
As requested by Samuel, there's not really any reason to have "shared" in the name. This also modifies the only user of the function, as well. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd: add platform_device sharing support for mfdAndres Salomon
This adds functions to enable platform_device sharing for mfd clients. Each platform driver (mfd client) that wants to share an mfd_cell's platform_device uses the mfd_shared_platform_driver_{un,}register() functions instead of platform_driver_{un,}register(). Along with registering the platform driver, these also register a new platform device with the same characteristics as the original cell, but a different name. Given an mfd_cell with the name "foo", drivers that want to share access to its resources can call mfd_shared_platform_driver_register with platform drivers named (for example) "bar" and "baz". This will register two platform devices and drivers named "bar" and "baz" that share the same cell as the platform device "foo". The drivers can then call "foo" cell's enable hooks (or mfd_shared_cell_enable) to enable resources, and obtain platform resources as they normally would. This deals with platform handling only; mfd driver-specific details, hardware handling, refcounting, etc are all dealt with separately. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd: Add refcounting support to mfd_cellsAndres Salomon
This provides convenience functions for sharing of cells across multiple mfd clients. Mfd drivers can provide enable/disable hooks to actually tweak the hardware, and clients can call mfd_shared_cell_{en,dis}able without having to worry about whether or not another client happens to have enabled or disabled the cell/hardware. Note that this is purely optional; drivers can continue to use the mfd_cell's enable/disable hooks for their own purposes, if desired. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd: Remove driver_data field from mfd_cellAndres Salomon
All users of this have now been switched over to using mfd_data; it can go away now. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd-core: Unconditionally add mfd_cell to every platform_deviceAndres Salomon
Previously, one would set the mfd_cell's platform_data/data_size to point to the current mfd_cell in order to pass that information along to drivers. This causes the current mfd_cell to always be available to drivers. It also adds a wrapper function for fetching the mfd cell from a platform device, similar to what originally existed for mfd devices. Drivers who previously used platform_data for other purposes can still use it; the difference is that mfd_get_data() must be used to access it (and the pdata structure is no longer allocated in mfd_add_devices). Note that mfd_get_data is intentionally vague (in name) about where the data is stored; variable name changes can come later without having to touch brazillions of drivers. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-01-14mfd: Provide pm_runtime_no_callbacks flag in cell dataMark Brown
Allow MFD cells to have pm_runtime_no_callbacks() called on them during registration. This causes the runtime PM framework to ignore them, allowing use of runtime PM to suspend the device as a whole even if not all drivers for the MFD can usefully implement runtime PM. For example, RTCs are likely to run continuously regardless of the power state of the system. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2010-10-28mfd: Add devices platform data when the cell data size is not 0Brian Harring
When the cell data_size is 0, the resulting platform_data pointer will be set to ZERO_SIZE_PTR. That could be misleading for device drivers running a NULL check on thei platform_data pointer before dereferencing it. Signed-off-by: Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2010-10-28mfd: Allow for bypass of cell resource conflict checkDaniel Drake
The upcoming VIA VX855 MFD driver needs to communicate resources to subdevices where the resources may be claimed by ACPI. Add a flag to mfd_cell to request that resources are not policed. Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2010-08-12mfd: properly handle platform_device_add_resources fail in mfd_add_deviceAxel Lin
platform_device_add_resources may fail, thus add error checking for it. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2010-05-27mfd: Check for mem_base when building IORESOURCE_MEM resourcesSamuel Ortiz
If mem_base is NULL, then we fall back to the default case, just copying the original resource. Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2010-03-30include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking ↵Tejun Heo
implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-07mfd: Check for ACPI conflictsSamuel Ortiz
For ACPI based systems, we should check for ACPI conflicts when adding the platform devices. The test will always succeed for non ACPI platforms. Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2009-09-17mfd: Allow multiple MFD cells with the same nameMark Brown
Provide basic support for MFDs having multiple cells of a given type with different IDs by adding an id to the mfd_cell structure and then adding that to the id passed in to mfd_add_devices(). As it stands this approach requires that MFDs using this feature deal with ensuring that there aren't any ID collisions resulting from multiple MFDs of the same type being instantiated. This needs to happen with the existing code too, but with this approach there is a knock on effect on the IDs for non-duplicated devices. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2009-01-04mfd: Pass driver_data onto child devicesMark Brown
The MFD cell structure provides a driver_data field but doesn't pass it on to the child devices when instantiating them - do that. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
2008-10-19mfd: reduce stack usage in mfd-core.cIan Molton
This patch moves the allocation of the resources off the stack in mfd_add_device(). Signed-off-by: Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
2008-07-28mfd: accept pure device as a parent, not only platform_deviceDmitry Baryshkov
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
2008-07-28mfd: add platform_data to mfd_cellMike Rapoport
Adding platform_data to mfd_cell allows passing of platform data directly to the platform_device created for each cell and thus reuse of existing drivers. On the other side it can be used as a hook to mfd_cell itself removing the need in mfd_get_cell method. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
2008-07-28mfd: Coding style fixesBen Dooks
Fix some coding style fixes in the mfd core driver. Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
2008-07-28mfd: Use to_platform_device instead of container_ofBen Dooks
Convert mfd_remove_devices_fn() to use to_platform_device() instead of doing container_of(). Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
2008-07-25mfd: don't use memzeroAndrew Morton
For it doesn't exist on i386. Cc: Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-07[ARM] 5127/1: Core MFD supportDmitry Baryshkov
This patch provides a common subdevice registration system for MFD type chips, using platfrom device. Signed-off-by: Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>