Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
NULL.
Patch provided by Eric Sandeen.
SGI-PV: 961693
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28199a
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
|
|
xfs_mac.h and xfs_cap.h provide definitions and macros that aren't used
anywhere in XFS at all. They are left-overs from "to be implement at some
point in the future" functionality that Irix XFS has. If this
functionality ever goes into Linux, it will be provided at a different
layer, most likely through the security hooks in the kernel so we will
never need this functionality in XFS.
Patch provided by Eric Sandeen (sandeen@sandeen.net).
SGI-PV: 960895
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28036a
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
|
|
The firstblock argument to xfs_bmap_finish is not used by that function.
Remove it and cleanup the code a bit.
Patch provided by Eric Sandeen.
SGI-PV: 960196
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28034a
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
|
|
pure bloat.
SGI-PV: 952969
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26251a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
shutdown vop flags consistent with sync vop flags declarations too.
SGI-PV: 939911
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26096a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
the range spanned by modifications to the in-core extent map. Add
XFS_BUNMAPI() and XFS_SWAP_EXTENTS() macros that call xfs_bunmapi() and
xfs_swap_extents() via the ioops vector. Change all calls that may modify
the in-core extent map for the data fork to go through the ioops vector.
This allows a cache of extent map data to be kept in sync.
SGI-PV: 947615
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:209226a
Signed-off-by: Olaf Weber <olaf@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
This patch switches XFS over to use the new mutex code directly as
opposed to the previous workaround patch I posted earlier that avoided
the namespace clash by forcing it back to semaphores. This falls in the
'works for me<tm>' category.
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
|
SGI-PV: 943272
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:199767a
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
boilerplate.
SGI-PV: 913862
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23917a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
SGI-PV: 943122
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23901a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
MAXINT
SGI-PV: 942528
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23828a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
which can cause an extent hole to be filled and a free extent to be
processed. In this case, we make a few mistakes: forget to pass back the
transaction, forget to put a hold on the buffer and forget to add the buf
to the new transaction.
SGI-PV: 940366
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23594a
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
SGI-PV: 932952
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:22929a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
SGI-PV: 938145
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:22901a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
SGI-PV: 932952
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:22805a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
SGI-PV: 936255
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:192760a
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
SGI-PV: 936255
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:192759a
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|