summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/mfd/core.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2012-09-15mfd: core: Push irqdomain mapping out into devicesMark Brown
Currently the MFD core supports remapping MFD cell interrupts using an irqdomain but only if the MFD is being instantiated using device tree and only if the device tree bindings use the pattern of registering IPs in the device tree with compatible properties. This will be actively harmful for drivers which support non-DT platforms and use this pattern for their DT bindings as it will mean that the core will silently change remapping behaviour and it is also limiting for drivers which don't do DT with this particular pattern. There is also a potential fragility if there are interrupts not associated with MFD cells and all the cells are omitted from the device tree for some reason. Instead change the code to take an IRQ domain as an optional argument, allowing drivers to take the decision about the parent domain for their interrupts. The one current user of this feature is ab8500-core, it has the domain lookup pushed out into the driver. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2012-07-08mfd: Attaching a node to new 'struct mfd_cell' of_compatible variableLee Jones
Applying a succinct description to the of_compatible variable recently added to the mfd_cell struct. Also link to the documentation page where more information can be found about compatible properties. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2012-07-08mfd: Make MFD core code Device Tree and IRQ domain awareLee Jones
During Device Tree enablement of the ab8500 and db8500-prcmu drivers, a decision was made to omit registration through the MFD API and use Device Tree directly. However, because MFD devices have a different address space and the ab8500 and db8500 both use I2C to communicate, this causes issues with address translation during execution of of_platform_populate(). So the solution is to make the MFD core aware of Device Tree and have it assign the correct node pointers instead. To make this work the MFD core also needs to be awere of IRQ domains, as Device Tree insists on IRQ domain compatibility. So, instead of providing an irq-base via platform code, in the DT case we simply look up the IRQ domain and map to the correct virtual IRQ. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-05-26mfd: Remove mfd_dataSamuel Ortiz
Cell pointers are passed through device->mfd_cell and platform data is passed through the MFD cell platform_data pointer. Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-05-26mfd: Add platform data pointer backSamuel Ortiz
Now that we have a way to pass MFD cells down to the sub drivers, we can gradually get rid of mfd_data by putting the platform pointer back in place. Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-04-12mfd: Fetch cell pointer from platform_device->mfd_cellSamuel Ortiz
In order for MFD drivers to fetch their cell pointer but also their platform data one, an mfd cell pointer is added to the platform_device structure. That allows all MFD sub devices drivers to be MFD agnostic, unless they really need to access their MFD cell data. Most of them don't, especially the ones for IPs used by both MFD and non MFD SoCs. Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-26mfd: Add mfd_clone_cell(), convert cs5535-mfd/olpc-xo1 to itAndres Salomon
Replace mfd_shared_platform_driver_register with mfd_clone_cell. The former was called by an mfd client, and registered both a platform driver and device. The latter is called by an mfd driver, and registers only a platform device. The downside of this is that mfd drivers need to be modified whenever new clients are added that share a cell; the upside is that it fits Linux's driver model better. It's also simpler. This also converts cs5535-mfd/olpc-xo1 from the old API. cs5535-mfd now creates the olpc-xo1-{acpi,pms} devices, while olpc-xo1 binds to them via platform drivers. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd: Rename mfd_shared_cell_{en,dis}able to drop the "shared" partAndres Salomon
As requested by Samuel, there's not really any reason to have "shared" in the name. This also modifies the only user of the function, as well. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd: add platform_device sharing support for mfdAndres Salomon
This adds functions to enable platform_device sharing for mfd clients. Each platform driver (mfd client) that wants to share an mfd_cell's platform_device uses the mfd_shared_platform_driver_{un,}register() functions instead of platform_driver_{un,}register(). Along with registering the platform driver, these also register a new platform device with the same characteristics as the original cell, but a different name. Given an mfd_cell with the name "foo", drivers that want to share access to its resources can call mfd_shared_platform_driver_register with platform drivers named (for example) "bar" and "baz". This will register two platform devices and drivers named "bar" and "baz" that share the same cell as the platform device "foo". The drivers can then call "foo" cell's enable hooks (or mfd_shared_cell_enable) to enable resources, and obtain platform resources as they normally would. This deals with platform handling only; mfd driver-specific details, hardware handling, refcounting, etc are all dealt with separately. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd: Add refcounting support to mfd_cellsAndres Salomon
This provides convenience functions for sharing of cells across multiple mfd clients. Mfd drivers can provide enable/disable hooks to actually tweak the hardware, and clients can call mfd_shared_cell_{en,dis}able without having to worry about whether or not another client happens to have enabled or disabled the cell/hardware. Note that this is purely optional; drivers can continue to use the mfd_cell's enable/disable hooks for their own purposes, if desired. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd: Remove driver_data field from mfd_cellAndres Salomon
All users of this have now been switched over to using mfd_data; it can go away now. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd: Rename platform_data field of mfd_cell to mfd_dataAndres Salomon
Rename the platform_data variable to imply a distinction between common platform_data driver usage (typically accessed via pdev->dev.platform_data) and the way MFD passes data down to clients (using a wrapper named mfd_get_data). All clients have already been changed to use the wrapper function, so this can be a quick single-commit change that only touches things in drivers/mfd. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd: Drop data_size from mfd_cell structAndres Salomon
Now that there are no more users of this, drop it. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd-core: Unconditionally add mfd_cell to every platform_deviceAndres Salomon
Previously, one would set the mfd_cell's platform_data/data_size to point to the current mfd_cell in order to pass that information along to drivers. This causes the current mfd_cell to always be available to drivers. It also adds a wrapper function for fetching the mfd cell from a platform device, similar to what originally existed for mfd devices. Drivers who previously used platform_data for other purposes can still use it; the difference is that mfd_get_data() must be used to access it (and the pdata structure is no longer allocated in mfd_add_devices). Note that mfd_get_data is intentionally vague (in name) about where the data is stored; variable name changes can come later without having to touch brazillions of drivers. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-23mfd-core: Fix up typos/vagueness in commentAndres Salomon
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2011-01-14mfd: Provide pm_runtime_no_callbacks flag in cell dataMark Brown
Allow MFD cells to have pm_runtime_no_callbacks() called on them during registration. This causes the runtime PM framework to ignore them, allowing use of runtime PM to suspend the device as a whole even if not all drivers for the MFD can usefully implement runtime PM. For example, RTCs are likely to run continuously regardless of the power state of the system. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2010-11-01tree-wide: fix comment/printk typosUwe Kleine-König
"gadget", "through", "command", "maintain", "maintain", "controller", "address", "between", "initiali[zs]e", "instead", "function", "select", "already", "equal", "access", "management", "hierarchy", "registration", "interest", "relative", "memory", "offset", "already", Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2010-10-28mfd: Allow for bypass of cell resource conflict checkDaniel Drake
The upcoming VIA VX855 MFD driver needs to communicate resources to subdevices where the resources may be claimed by ACPI. Add a flag to mfd_cell to request that resources are not policed. Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2009-09-17mfd: Allow multiple MFD cells with the same nameMark Brown
Provide basic support for MFDs having multiple cells of a given type with different IDs by adding an id to the mfd_cell structure and then adding that to the id passed in to mfd_add_devices(). As it stands this approach requires that MFDs using this feature deal with ensuring that there aren't any ID collisions resulting from multiple MFDs of the same type being instantiated. This needs to happen with the existing code too, but with this approach there is a knock on effect on the IDs for non-duplicated devices. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-28mfd: accept pure device as a parent, not only platform_deviceDmitry Baryshkov
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
2008-07-28mfd: add platform_data to mfd_cellMike Rapoport
Adding platform_data to mfd_cell allows passing of platform data directly to the platform_device created for each cell and thus reuse of existing drivers. On the other side it can be used as a hook to mfd_cell itself removing the need in mfd_get_cell method. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
2008-07-28mfd: Coding style fixesBen Dooks
Fix some coding style fixes in the mfd core driver. Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
2008-07-07[ARM] 5127/1: Core MFD supportDmitry Baryshkov
This patch provides a common subdevice registration system for MFD type chips, using platfrom device. Signed-off-by: Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>