summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/sctp.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2008-02-05[SCTP]: Stop claiming that this is a "reference implementation"Vlad Yasevich
I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be "the reference implementation". First of all, "the refrence implementation" was the original implementation of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others. Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation', we don't really meet the requirements. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2007-10-10[SCTP]: protocol definitions for SCTP-AUTH implementationVlad Yasevich
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[SCTP]: Implement the Supported Extensions ParameterVlad Yasevich
SCTP Supported Extenions parameter is specified in Section 4.2.7 of the ADD-IP draft (soon to be RFC). The parameter is encoded as: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Parameter Type = 0x8008 | Parameter Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | CHUNK TYPE 1 | CHUNK TYPE 2 | CHUNK TYPE 3 | CHUNK TYPE 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | .... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | CHUNK TYPE N | PAD | PAD | PAD | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ It contains a list of chunks that a particular SCTP extension uses. Current extensions supported are Partial Reliability (FWD-TSN) and ADD-IP (ASCONF and ASCONF-ACK). When implementing new extensions (AUTH, PKT-DROP, etc..), new chunks need to be added to this parameter. Parameter processing would be modified to negotiate support for these new features. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-04-26[SK_BUFF]: Introduce skb_transport_header(skb)Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
For the places where we need a pointer to the transport header, it is still legal to touch skb->h.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-04-26[SCTP]: Introduce sctp_hdr()Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
For consistency with all the other skb->h.raw accessors. Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-12-22[SCTP]: Fix typo adaption -> adaptation as per the latest API draft.Ivan Skytte Jorgensen
Signed-off-by: Ivan Skytte Jorgensen <isj-sctp@i1.dk> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-12-03[SCTP]: Annotate SCTP headers.Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!