Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
functions
[ Upstream commit 85fbaa75037d0b6b786ff18658ddf0b4014ce2a4 ]
Commit bceaa90240b6019ed73b49965eac7d167610be69 ("inet: prevent leakage
of uninitialized memory to user in recv syscalls") conditionally updated
addr_len if the msg_name is written to. The recv_error and rxpmtu
functions relied on the recvmsg functions to set up addr_len before.
As this does not happen any more we have to pass addr_len to those
functions as well and set it to the size of the corresponding sockaddr
length.
This broke traceroute and such.
Fixes: bceaa90240b6 ("inet: prevent leakage of uninitialized memory to user in recv syscalls")
Reported-by: Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>
Reported-by: Tom Labanowski
Cc: mpb <mpb.mail@gmail.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
ping_v6_sendmsg currently returns 0 on success. It should return
the number of bytes written instead.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
net/ipv4/ping.c:286:5: sparse: symbol 'ping_check_bind_addr' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv4/ping.c:355:6: sparse: symbol 'ping_set_saddr' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv4/ping.c:370:6: sparse: symbol 'ping_clear_saddr' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/ping.c:60:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ipv6_recv_error' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/ping.c:64:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ip6_datagram_recv_ctl' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/ping.c:69:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_icmpv6_err_convert' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/ping.c:73:6: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ipv6_icmp_error' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/ping.c:75:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ipv6_chk_addr' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/ping.c:201:5: sparse: symbol 'ping_v6_seq_show' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Merge 'net' bug fixes into 'net-next' as we have patches
that will build on top of them.
This merge commit includes a change from Emil Goode
(emilgoode@gmail.com) that fixes a warning that would
have been introduced by this merge. Specifically it
fixes the pingv6_ops method ipv6_chk_addr() to add a
"const" to the "struct net_device *dev" argument and
likewise update the dummy_ipv6_chk_addr() declaration.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The format is based on /proc/net/icmp and /proc/net/{udp,raw}6.
Compiles and displays reasonable results with CONFIG_IPV6={n,m,y}
Couldn't figure out how to test without CONFIG_PROC_FS enabled.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This adds the ability to send ICMPv6 echo requests without a
raw socket. The equivalent ability for ICMPv4 was added in
2011.
Instead of having separate code paths for IPv4 and IPv6, make
most of the code in net/ipv4/ping.c dual-stack and only add a
few IPv6-specific bits (like the protocol definition) to a new
net/ipv6/ping.c. Hopefully this will reduce divergence and/or
duplication of bugs in the future.
Caveats:
- Setting options via ancillary data (e.g., using IPV6_PKTINFO
to specify the outgoing interface) is not yet supported.
- There are no separate security settings for IPv4 and IPv6;
everything is controlled by /proc/net/ipv4/ping_group_range.
- The proc interface does not yet display IPv6 ping sockets
properly.
Tested with a patched copy of ping6 and using raw socket calls.
Compiles and works with all of CONFIG_IPV6={n,m,y}.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|