Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This bug shows up when file stored on the ext4 file system is updated.
The ext4fs_delete_file() is responsible for deleting file's (e.g. uImage)
data.
However some global data (especially ext4fs_indir2_block), which is used
during file deletion are left unchanged.
The ext4fs_indir2_block pointer stores reference to old ext4 double
indirect allocated blocks. When it is unchanged, after file deletion,
ext4fs_write_file() uses the same pointer (since it is already initialized
- i.e. not NULL) to return number of blocks to write. This trunks larger
file when previous one was smaller.
Lets consider following scenario:
1. Flash target with ext4 formatted boot.img (which has uImage [*] on itself)
2. Developer wants to upload their custom uImage [**]
- When new uImage [**] is smaller than the [*] - everything works
correctly - we are able to store the whole smaller file with corrupted
ext4fs_indir2_block pointer
- When new uImage [**] is larger than the [*] - theCRC is corrupted,
since truncation on data stored at eMMC was done.
3. When uImage CRC error appears, then reboot and LTHOR/DFU reflashing causes
proper setting of ext4fs_indir2_block() and after that uImage[**]
is successfully stored (correct uImage [*] metadata is stored at an
eMMC on the first flashing).
Due to above the bug was very difficult to reproduce.
This patch sets default values for all ext4fs_indir* pointers/variables.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
|
|
This hooks into the generic "file exists" support added in an earlier
patch, and provides an implementation for the ext4 filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
With CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA, lbaint_t gets defined as a 64-bit type,
which is required to represent block numbers for storage devices that
exceed 2TiB (the block size usually is 512B), e.g. recent hard drives
We now use lbaint_t for partition offset to reflect the lbaint_t change,
and access partitions beyond or crossing the 2.1TiB limit.
This required changes to signature of ext4fs_devread(), and type of all
variables relatives to block sector.
ext2/ext4 fs uses logical block represented by a 32 bit value. Logical
block is a multiple of device block sector. To avoid overflow problem
when calling ext4fs_devread(), we need to cast the sector parameter.
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Leroy <fredo@starox.org>
|
|
The 512 byte block size was hard coded in the ext4 file systems.
Large harddisks today support bigger block sizes typically 4096
bytes.
This patch removes this limitation.
Signed-off-by: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com>
|
|
It doesn't make a lot of sense to have these methods in fs.c. They are
filesystem-specific, not generic code. Add each to the relevant
filesystem and remove the associated #ifdefs in fs.c.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
This makes the FAT and ext4 filesystem implementations build if
CONFIG_FS_{FAT,EXT4} are defined, rather than basing the build on
whether CONFIG_CMD_{FAT,EXT*} are defined. This will allow the
filesystems to be built separately from the filesystem-specific commands
that use them. This paves the way for the creation of filesystem-generic
commands that used the filesystems, without requiring the filesystem-
specific commands.
Minor documentation changes are made for this change.
The new config options are automatically selected by the old config
options to retain backwards-compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
|
|
On x86 machines gd is unfortunately a #define, so we should avoid using
gd for anything. This patch changes uses of gd to bgd so that ext4fs
can be used on x86.
A better fix would be to remove the #define in x86, but I'm not sure
how to do that.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Convert ext2/4 load, ls, and write functions to use common device and
partition parsing function. With the common function "dev:part" can come
from the environment and a '-' can be used in that case.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
|
|
There's no real need to expose this and it can be removed by using a static
allocation.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Manjunatha C Achar <a.manjunatha@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Iqbal Shareef <iqbal.ams@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Hakgoo Lee <goodguy.lee@samsung.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Manjunatha C Achar <a.manjunatha@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Iqbal Shareef <iqbal.ams@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Hakgoo Lee <goodguy.lee@samsung.com>
|