summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/pinctrl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>2013-12-16 15:09:25 (GMT)
committerJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>2014-03-31 12:22:32 (GMT)
commit1743fc6cc6a54a4fac440ce885752cee819ed25a (patch)
tree94f184f769c9b7b4a2966d5e704d9f7afaa75e49 /drivers/pinctrl
parent6d05cdce4fb86af309b91cc1e055e995f79c9a72 (diff)
downloadlinux-fsl-qoriq-1743fc6cc6a54a4fac440ce885752cee819ed25a.tar.xz
Input: elantech - improve clickpad detection
commit c15bdfd5b9831e4cab8cfc118243956e267dd30e upstream. The current assumption in the elantech driver that hw version 3 touchpads are never clickpads and hw version 4 touchpads are always clickpads is wrong. There are several bug reports for this, ie: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030802 http://superuser.com/questions/619582/right-elantech-touchpad-button-not-working-in-linux I've spend a couple of hours wading through various bugzillas, launchpads and forum posts to create a list of fw-versions and capabilities for different laptop models to find a good method to differentiate between clickpads and versions with separate hardware buttons. Which shows that a device being a clickpad is reliable indicated by bit 12 being set in the fw_version. I've included the gathered list inside the driver, so that we've this info at hand if we need to revisit this later. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/pinctrl')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions