| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
[ Upstream commit aee636c4809fa54848ff07a899b326eb1f9987a2 ]
At first Jakub Zawadzki noticed that some divisions by reciprocal_divide
were not correct. (off by one in some cases)
http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/reciprocal-buggy.c
He could also show this with BPF:
http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/set-and-dump-filter-k-bug.c
The reciprocal divide in linux kernel is not generic enough,
lets remove its use in BPF, as it is not worth the pain with
current cpus.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws@darkjames.pl>
Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dxchgb@gmail.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
on x86 system with net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1
sudo tcpdump -i eth1 'tcp port 22'
causes the warning:
[ 56.766097] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 56.766097]
[ 56.780146] CPU0
[ 56.786807] ----
[ 56.793188] lock(&(&vb->lock)->rlock);
[ 56.799593] <Interrupt>
[ 56.805889] lock(&(&vb->lock)->rlock);
[ 56.812266]
[ 56.812266] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 56.812266]
[ 56.830670] 1 lock held by ksoftirqd/1/13:
[ 56.836838] #0: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8118f44c>] vm_unmap_aliases+0x8c/0x380
[ 56.849757]
[ 56.849757] stack backtrace:
[ 56.862194] CPU: 1 PID: 13 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc3+ #45
[ 56.868721] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P8Z77 WS, BIOS 3007 07/26/2012
[ 56.882004] ffffffff821944c0 ffff88080bbdb8c8 ffffffff8175a145 0000000000000007
[ 56.895630] ffff88080bbd5f40 ffff88080bbdb928 ffffffff81755b14 0000000000000001
[ 56.909313] ffff880800000001 ffff880800000000 ffffffff8101178f 0000000000000001
[ 56.923006] Call Trace:
[ 56.929532] [<ffffffff8175a145>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
[ 56.936067] [<ffffffff81755b14>] print_usage_bug+0x1f7/0x208
[ 56.942445] [<ffffffff8101178f>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x50
[ 56.948932] [<ffffffff810cc0a0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x150/0x150
[ 56.955470] [<ffffffff810ccb52>] mark_lock+0x282/0x2c0
[ 56.961945] [<ffffffff810ccfed>] __lock_acquire+0x45d/0x1d50
[ 56.968474] [<ffffffff810cce6e>] ? __lock_acquire+0x2de/0x1d50
[ 56.975140] [<ffffffff81393bf5>] ? cpumask_next_and+0x55/0x90
[ 56.981942] [<ffffffff810cef72>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x1d0
[ 56.988745] [<ffffffff8118f52a>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380
[ 56.995619] [<ffffffff817628f1>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50
[ 57.002493] [<ffffffff8118f52a>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380
[ 57.009447] [<ffffffff8118f52a>] vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380
[ 57.016477] [<ffffffff8118f44c>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x8c/0x380
[ 57.023607] [<ffffffff810436b0>] change_page_attr_set_clr+0xc0/0x460
[ 57.030818] [<ffffffff810cfb8d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 57.037896] [<ffffffff811a8330>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xb0/0x2b0
[ 57.044789] [<ffffffff811b59c3>] ? free_object_rcu+0x93/0xa0
[ 57.051720] [<ffffffff81043d9f>] set_memory_rw+0x2f/0x40
[ 57.058727] [<ffffffff8104e17c>] bpf_jit_free+0x2c/0x40
[ 57.065577] [<ffffffff81642cba>] sk_filter_release_rcu+0x1a/0x30
[ 57.072338] [<ffffffff811108e2>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x202/0x7c0
[ 57.078962] [<ffffffff81057f17>] __do_softirq+0xf7/0x3f0
[ 57.085373] [<ffffffff81058245>] run_ksoftirqd+0x35/0x70
cannot reuse jited filter memory, since it's readonly,
so use original bpf insns memory to hold work_struct
defer kfree of sk_filter until jit completed freeing
tested on x86_64 and i386
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
module_free()/vfree() takes care of details, we no longer need a wrapper
and a work_struct.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
If bpf_jit_enable > 1, then we dump the emitted JIT compiled image
after creation. Currently, only SPARC and PowerPC has similar output
as in the reference implementation on x86_64. Make a small helper
function in order to reduce duplicated code and make the dump output
uniform across architectures x86_64, SPARC, PPC, ARM (e.g. on ARM
flen, pass and proglen are currently not shown, but would be
interesting to know as well), also for future BPF JIT implementations
on other archs.
Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@google.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This patch is a follow-up for patch "net: filter: add vlan tag access"
to support the new VLAN_TAG/VLAN_TAG_PRESENT accessors in BPF JIT.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This patch is a follow-up for patch "filter: add XOR instruction for use
with X/K" that implements BPF SPARC JIT parts for the BPF XOR operation.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Fix mixed space and tabs.
Put bpf_jit_load_*[] externs into bpf_jit.h
"while(0)" --> "while (0)"
"COND (X)" --> "COND(X)"
Document branch offset calculations, and bpf_error's return
sequence.
Document the reason we need to emit three nops between the
%y register write and the divide instruction.
Remove erroneous trailing semicolons from emit_read_y() and
emit_write_y().
Based upon feedback from Sam Ravnborg.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Correct conventions comments. %o4 and %o5 were swapped,
%g3 was not documented.
Use r_TMP instead of r_SKB_DATA + r_OFF where possible in
assembler stubs.
Correct discussion of %o4 and %o5 in one of bpf_jit_compile()'s
comments.
Based upon feedback from Richard Mortimer.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
