diff options
author | Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com> | 2012-11-27 06:45:00 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com> | 2012-12-05 07:43:33 (GMT) |
commit | 0e81047996fdde7fc9e8a1c01d532df1f53586fa (patch) | |
tree | 5058e4ef6c04c1468de4f6c333ebbb59e702c6e0 /drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c | |
parent | 9ebcb232158c737db21e22b7bfdc4fc6d661ea8c (diff) | |
download | linux-fsl-qoriq-0e81047996fdde7fc9e8a1c01d532df1f53586fa.tar.xz |
wlcore: improved Tx scheduling algorithm
Prioritize EDCA by choosing the AC before anything else. Use the
fast/slow link bitmap in FW to improve the scheduling algorithm for
the multi-link scenario.
Set packet thresholds to determine if a given link is high or low
priority according to its speed. A slow link will be given high priority
if the amount of packets queued for it in the FW is lower than the
slow-threshold. Similarly, a fast link will be given high priority if
the number of its packets queued in FW is smaller than the high-threshold.
The improved algorithm:
1. Choose optimal AC according to FW utilization
2. Traversing the VIFs in a round-robin fashion, try to choose a high
priority link. Links are traversed in a round-robin fashion inside a
VIF.
3. If no high priority links are found, choose the first non-empty
(low priority) link found in the round robin.
Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c | 124 |
1 files changed, 90 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c index 076983b..fbda3cb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c @@ -467,8 +467,7 @@ void wl1271_handle_tx_low_watermark(struct wl1271 *wl) } } -static struct sk_buff_head *wl1271_select_queue(struct wl1271 *wl, - struct sk_buff_head *queues) +static int wlcore_select_ac(struct wl1271 *wl) { int i, q = -1, ac; u32 min_pkts = 0xffffffff; @@ -482,33 +481,24 @@ static struct sk_buff_head *wl1271_select_queue(struct wl1271 *wl, */ for (i = 0; i < NUM_TX_QUEUES; i++) { ac = wl1271_tx_get_queue(i); - if (!skb_queue_empty(&queues[ac]) && - (wl->tx_allocated_pkts[ac] < min_pkts)) { + if (wl->tx_queue_count[ac] && + wl->tx_allocated_pkts[ac] < min_pkts) { q = ac; min_pkts = wl->tx_allocated_pkts[q]; } } - if (q == -1) - return NULL; - - return &queues[q]; + return q; } -static struct sk_buff *wl12xx_lnk_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl, - struct wl1271_link *lnk) +static struct sk_buff *wlcore_lnk_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl, + struct wl1271_link *lnk, u8 q) { struct sk_buff *skb; unsigned long flags; - struct sk_buff_head *queue; - queue = wl1271_select_queue(wl, lnk->tx_queue); - if (!queue) - return NULL; - - skb = skb_dequeue(queue); + skb = skb_dequeue(&lnk->tx_queue[q]); if (skb) { - int q = wl1271_tx_get_queue(skb_get_queue_mapping(skb)); spin_lock_irqsave(&wl->wl_lock, flags); WARN_ON_ONCE(wl->tx_queue_count[q] <= 0); wl->tx_queue_count[q]--; @@ -522,9 +512,41 @@ static struct sk_buff *wl12xx_lnk_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl, return skb; } -static struct sk_buff *wl12xx_vif_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl, - struct wl12xx_vif *wlvif, - u8 *hlid) +static bool wlcore_lnk_high_prio(struct wl1271 *wl, u8 hlid, + struct wl1271_link *lnk) +{ + u8 thold; + + if (test_bit(hlid, (unsigned long *)&wl->fw_fast_lnk_map)) + thold = wl->conf.tx.fast_link_thold; + else + thold = wl->conf.tx.slow_link_thold; + + return lnk->allocated_pkts < thold; +} + +static struct sk_buff *wlcore_lnk_dequeue_high_prio(struct wl1271 *wl, + u8 hlid, u8 ac, + u8 *low_prio_hlid) +{ + struct wl1271_link *lnk = &wl->links[hlid]; + + if (!wlcore_lnk_high_prio(wl, hlid, lnk)) { + if (*low_prio_hlid == WL12XX_INVALID_LINK_ID && + !skb_queue_empty(&lnk->tx_queue[ac])) + /* we found the first non-empty low priority queue */ + *low_prio_hlid = hlid; + + return NULL; + } + + return wlcore_lnk_dequeue(wl, lnk, ac); +} + +static struct sk_buff *wlcore_vif_dequeue_high_prio(struct wl1271 *wl, + struct wl12xx_vif *wlvif, + u8 ac, u8 *hlid, + u8 *low_prio_hlid) { struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; int i, h, start_hlid; @@ -540,7 +562,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *wl12xx_vif_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl, if (!test_bit(h, wlvif->links_map)) continue; - skb = wl12xx_lnk_skb_dequeue(wl, &wl->links[h]); + skb = wlcore_lnk_dequeue_high_prio(wl, h, ac, + low_prio_hlid); if (!skb) continue; @@ -560,42 +583,74 @@ static struct sk_buff *wl1271_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl, u8 *hlid) unsigned long flags; struct wl12xx_vif *wlvif = wl->last_wlvif; struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; + int ac; + u8 low_prio_hlid = WL12XX_INVALID_LINK_ID; + + ac = wlcore_select_ac(wl); + if (ac < 0) + goto out; /* continue from last wlvif (round robin) */ if (wlvif) { wl12xx_for_each_wlvif_continue(wl, wlvif) { - skb = wl12xx_vif_skb_dequeue(wl, wlvif, hlid); - if (skb) { - wl->last_wlvif = wlvif; - break; - } + if (!wlvif->tx_queue_count[ac]) + continue; + + skb = wlcore_vif_dequeue_high_prio(wl, wlvif, ac, hlid, + &low_prio_hlid); + if (!skb) + continue; + + wl->last_wlvif = wlvif; + break; } } /* dequeue from the system HLID before the restarting wlvif list */ if (!skb) { - skb = wl12xx_lnk_skb_dequeue(wl, &wl->links[wl->system_hlid]); - *hlid = wl->system_hlid; + skb = wlcore_lnk_dequeue_high_prio(wl, wl->system_hlid, + ac, &low_prio_hlid); + if (skb) { + *hlid = wl->system_hlid; + wl->last_wlvif = NULL; + } } - /* do a new pass over the wlvif list */ + /* Do a new pass over the wlvif list. But no need to continue + * after last_wlvif. The previous pass should have found it. */ if (!skb) { wl12xx_for_each_wlvif(wl, wlvif) { - skb = wl12xx_vif_skb_dequeue(wl, wlvif, hlid); + if (!wlvif->tx_queue_count[ac]) + goto next; + + skb = wlcore_vif_dequeue_high_prio(wl, wlvif, ac, hlid, + &low_prio_hlid); if (skb) { wl->last_wlvif = wlvif; break; } - /* - * No need to continue after last_wlvif. The previous - * pass should have found it. - */ +next: if (wlvif == wl->last_wlvif) break; } } + /* no high priority skbs found - but maybe a low priority one? */ + if (!skb && low_prio_hlid != WL12XX_INVALID_LINK_ID) { + struct wl1271_link *lnk = &wl->links[low_prio_hlid]; + skb = wlcore_lnk_dequeue(wl, lnk, ac); + + WARN_ON(!skb); /* we checked this before */ + *hlid = low_prio_hlid; + + /* ensure proper round robin in the vif/link levels */ + wl->last_wlvif = lnk->wlvif; + if (lnk->wlvif) + lnk->wlvif->last_tx_hlid = low_prio_hlid; + + } + if (!skb && test_and_clear_bit(WL1271_FLAG_DUMMY_PACKET_PENDING, &wl->flags)) { int q; @@ -609,6 +664,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *wl1271_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl, u8 *hlid) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wl->wl_lock, flags); } +out: return skb; } |