xfs: consolidate & clarify mount sanity checks

Pavol pointed out that there is one silent error case in the mount
path, and that others are rather uninformative.

I've taken Pavol's suggested patch and extended it a bit to also:

* fix a message which says "turned off" but actually errors out
* consolidate the vaguely differentiated "SB sanity check [12]"
  messages, and hexdump the superblock for analysis

Original-patch-by: Pavol Gono <Pavol.Gono@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

2 files changed, 18 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
index 8f6fc1a..c13fed8 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
@@ -249,6 +249,11 @@ typedef struct xfs_fsop_resblks {
 #define XFS_MAX_LOG_BYTES \
 	((2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024ULL) - XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES)
 
+/* Used for sanity checks on superblock */
+#define XFS_MAX_DBLOCKS(s) ((xfs_drfsbno_t)(s)->sb_agcount * (s)->sb_agblocks)
+#define XFS_MIN_DBLOCKS(s) ((xfs_drfsbno_t)((s)->sb_agcount - 1) *	\
+			 (s)->sb_agblocks + XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS)
+
 /*
  * Structures for XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA, XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSLOG & XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSRT
  */
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
index 77ffe3ce..2be5e5c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * More sanity checking. These were stolen directly from
+	 * More sanity checking.  Most of these were stolen directly from
 	 * xfs_repair.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(
@@ -371,23 +371,13 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
 	    (sbp->sb_blocklog - sbp->sb_inodelog != sbp->sb_inopblog)	||
 	    (sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize > XFS_MAX_RTEXTSIZE)	||
 	    (sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize < XFS_MIN_RTEXTSIZE)	||
-	    (sbp->sb_imax_pct > 100 /* zero sb_imax_pct is valid */))) {
+	    (sbp->sb_imax_pct > 100 /* zero sb_imax_pct is valid */)	||
+	    sbp->sb_dblocks == 0					||
+	    sbp->sb_dblocks > XFS_MAX_DBLOCKS(sbp)			||
+	    sbp->sb_dblocks < XFS_MIN_DBLOCKS(sbp))) {
 		if (loud)
-			xfs_warn(mp, "SB sanity check 1 failed");
-		return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED);
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Sanity check AG count, size fields against data size field
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(
-	    sbp->sb_dblocks == 0 ||
-	    sbp->sb_dblocks >
-	     (xfs_drfsbno_t)sbp->sb_agcount * sbp->sb_agblocks ||
-	    sbp->sb_dblocks < (xfs_drfsbno_t)(sbp->sb_agcount - 1) *
-			      sbp->sb_agblocks + XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS)) {
-		if (loud)
-			xfs_warn(mp, "SB sanity check 2 failed");
+			XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR("SB sanity check failed",
+				XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp, sbp);
 		return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED);
 	}
 
@@ -864,7 +854,8 @@ xfs_update_alignment(xfs_mount_t *mp)
 		if ((BBTOB(mp->m_dalign) & mp->m_blockmask) ||
 		    (BBTOB(mp->m_swidth) & mp->m_blockmask)) {
 			if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RETERR) {
-				xfs_warn(mp, "alignment check 1 failed");
+				xfs_warn(mp, "alignment check failed: "
+					 "(sunit/swidth vs. blocksize)");
 				return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
 			}
 			mp->m_dalign = mp->m_swidth = 0;
@@ -875,6 +866,8 @@ xfs_update_alignment(xfs_mount_t *mp)
 			mp->m_dalign = XFS_BB_TO_FSBT(mp, mp->m_dalign);
 			if (mp->m_dalign && (sbp->sb_agblocks % mp->m_dalign)) {
 				if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RETERR) {
+					xfs_warn(mp, "alignment check failed: "
+						 "(sunit/swidth vs. ag size)");
 					return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
 				}
 				xfs_warn(mp,
@@ -889,8 +882,8 @@ xfs_update_alignment(xfs_mount_t *mp)
 				mp->m_swidth = XFS_BB_TO_FSBT(mp, mp->m_swidth);
 			} else {
 				if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RETERR) {
-					xfs_warn(mp,
-		"stripe alignment turned off: sunit(%d) less than bsize(%d)",
+					xfs_warn(mp, "alignment check failed: "
+						"sunit(%d) less than bsize(%d)",
 						mp->m_dalign,
 						mp->m_blockmask +1);
 					return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);