diff options
author | Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk> | 2008-02-23 23:24:01 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> | 2008-02-24 01:12:16 (GMT) |
commit | 00d6296145c6b671a9886e380efc24f2731d856a (patch) | |
tree | 2dbef82cc0b1b89d23187ade50ee4042c5bc10b0 /include/asm-sh/errno.h | |
parent | ff10e5dc1781cd0121f8ee936234c222ff15c105 (diff) | |
download | linux-fsl-qoriq-00d6296145c6b671a9886e380efc24f2731d856a.tar.xz |
kernel-doc: fix function-pointer-parameter parsing
When running "make htmldocs" I'm seeing some non-fatal perl errors caused
by trying to parse the callback function definitions in blk-core.c.
The errors are "Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.)..."
in combination with:
Warning(linux-2.6.25-rc2/block/blk-core.c:1877): No description found for parameter ''
The function pointers are defined without a * i.e.
int (drv_callback)(struct request *)
The compiler is happy with them, but kernel-doc isn't.
This patch teaches create_parameterlist in kernel-doc to parse this type of
function pointer definition, but is it the right way to fix the problem ?
The problem only seems to occur in blk-core.c.
However with the patch applied, kernel-doc finds the correct parameter
description for the callback in blk_end_request_callback, which is doesn't
normally.
I thought it would be a bit odd to change to code to use the more normal
form of function pointers just to get the documentation to work, so I fixed
kernel-doc instead - even though this is teaching it to understand code
that might go away (The comment for blk_end_request_callback says that it
should not be used and will removed at some point).
Signed-off-by: Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/asm-sh/errno.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions