summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/bluetooth
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@nokia.com>2011-01-04 13:40:05 (GMT)
committerGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>2011-02-08 03:40:06 (GMT)
commit03b555e119de8288a16e086e1fbd223d9b429d3d (patch)
tree5f0dd5efc8439ba4300761bc9ebba22c3d718c06 /net/bluetooth
parent930e13363fb0e94db6e8b59c54dfb5c59355113e (diff)
downloadlinux-fsl-qoriq-03b555e119de8288a16e086e1fbd223d9b429d3d.tar.xz
Bluetooth: Reject pairing requests when in non-pairable mode
This patch adds the necessary logic to act accordingly when the HCI_PAIRABLE flag is not set. In that case PIN code replies as well as Secure Simple Pairing requests without a NoBonding requirement need to be rejected. Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bluetooth')
-rw-r--r--net/bluetooth/hci_event.c55
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
index a8a38f1..cf3014a 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -1595,6 +1595,10 @@ static inline void hci_pin_code_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff
hci_conn_put(conn);
}
+ if (!test_bit(HCI_PAIRABLE, &hdev->flags))
+ hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_PIN_CODE_NEG_REPLY,
+ sizeof(ev->bdaddr), &ev->bdaddr);
+
hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
}
@@ -1885,9 +1889,52 @@ static inline void hci_io_capa_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff
hci_dev_lock(hdev);
conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ACL_LINK, &ev->bdaddr);
- if (conn)
- hci_conn_hold(conn);
+ if (!conn)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ hci_conn_hold(conn);
+
+ if (!test_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags))
+ goto unlock;
+
+ if (test_bit(HCI_PAIRABLE, &hdev->flags) ||
+ (conn->remote_auth & ~0x01) == HCI_AT_NO_BONDING) {
+ /* FIXME: Do IO capa response based on information
+ * provided through the management interface */
+ } else {
+ struct hci_cp_io_capability_neg_reply cp;
+
+ bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, &ev->bdaddr);
+ cp.reason = 0x16; /* Pairing not allowed */
+ hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_IO_CAPABILITY_NEG_REPLY,
+ sizeof(cp), &cp);
+ }
+
+unlock:
+ hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
+}
+
+static inline void hci_io_capa_reply_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct hci_ev_io_capa_reply *ev = (void *) skb->data;
+ struct hci_conn *conn;
+
+ BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name);
+
+ hci_dev_lock(hdev);
+
+ conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ACL_LINK, &ev->bdaddr);
+ if (!conn)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ hci_conn_hold(conn);
+
+ conn->remote_cap = ev->capability;
+ conn->remote_oob = ev->oob_data;
+ conn->remote_auth = ev->authentication;
+
+unlock:
hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
}
@@ -2051,6 +2098,10 @@ void hci_event_packet(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
hci_io_capa_request_evt(hdev, skb);
break;
+ case HCI_EV_IO_CAPA_REPLY:
+ hci_io_capa_reply_evt(hdev, skb);
+ break;
+
case HCI_EV_SIMPLE_PAIR_COMPLETE:
hci_simple_pair_complete_evt(hdev, skb);
break;