[NETFILTER]: Fix possible overflow in netfilters do_replace()

netfilter's do_replace() can overflow on addition within SMP_ALIGN()
and/or on multiplication by NR_CPUS, resulting in a buffer overflow on
the copy_from_user().  In practice, the overflow on addition is
triggerable on all systems, whereas the multiplication one might require
much physical memory to be present due to the check above.  Either is
sufficient to overwrite arbitrary amounts of kernel memory.

I really hate adding the same check to all 4 versions of do_replace(),
but the code is duplicate...

Found by Solar Designer during security audit of OpenVZ.org

Signed-Off-By: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>
Signed-Off-By: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrck McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
index 847068f..74ff56c 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
@@ -978,6 +978,13 @@ do_replace(void __user *user, unsigned int len)
 	if (copy_from_user(&tmp, user, sizeof(tmp)) != 0)
 		return -EFAULT;
 
+	/* overflow check */
+	if (tmp.size >= (INT_MAX - sizeof(struct xt_table_info)) / NR_CPUS -
+			SMP_CACHE_BYTES)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
 	if (!newinfo)
 		return -ENOMEM;