diff options
author | Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> | 2011-03-11 10:24:52 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> | 2011-03-11 14:22:00 (GMT) |
commit | 5cd2ad81f912c8535491f541108b655f4552dff9 (patch) | |
tree | 3dc74dc647e858967a33c777af91ee65e1dc6ac8 /sound/synth | |
parent | 88a8516a2128a6d078a106ead48092240e8a138f (diff) | |
download | linux-fsl-qoriq-5cd2ad81f912c8535491f541108b655f4552dff9.tar.xz |
ALSA: intel8x0m: wait a bit before warm reset check
At every resume a laptop I use prints this message (at KERN_ERR level):
ALSA sound/pci/intel8x0m.c:904: AC'97 warm reset still in progress? [0x2]
The thing to note here is that 0x2 corresponds to ICH_AC97COLD. Ie, what
seems to be happening is that the register involved indicated a warm
reset for some time (as the ICH_AC97WARM bit was set) but by the time
the warning is printed, and that same register is checked again, that
bit is already cleared and only the ICH_AC97COLD bit is still set.
It turns out a warm reset needs some time to settle, but it is currently
checked right away. The test therefore fails the first time it is done
and schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() will be called. Once we return
from that jiffies is already (far) past end_time on this laptop, so we
exit the loop, print a warning, and exit the function while the warm
reset actually succeeded.
A way to fix this is to call usleep_range() after writing to the
register involved. A handful of tests suggest 500 usecs is a safe value.
(This might punish the "finish cold reset" case, but on this laptop such
a cold reset apparently never happens, so I can't say for sure.)
While we're at it drop the extra single tick from end_time, as it looks
rather silly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'sound/synth')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions