summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-04-07Rewind v3.13-rc3+ (78fd82238d0e5716) to v3.12Scott Wood
2013-10-26x86/cpu: Track legacy CPU model data only on 32-bit kernelsJan Beulich
struct cpu_dev's c_models is only ever set inside CONFIG_X86_32 conditionals (or code that's being built for 32-bit only), so there's no use of reserving the (empty) space for the model names in a 64-bit kernel. Similarly, c_size_cache is only used in the #else of a CONFIG_X86_64 conditional, so reserving space for (and in one case even initializing) that field is pointless for 64-bit kernels too. While moving both fields to the end of the structure, I also noticed that: - the c_models array size was one too small, potentially causing table_lookup_model() to return garbage on Intel CPUs (intel.c's instance was lacking the sentinel with family being zero), so the patch bumps that by one, - c_models' vendor sub-field was unused (and anyway redundant with the base structure's c_x86_vendor field), so the patch deletes it. Also rename the legacy fields so that their legacy nature stands out and comment their declarations. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5265036802000078000FC4DB@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-06-28x86/tlb_info: get last level TLB entry number of CPUAlex Shi
For 4KB pages, x86 CPU has 2 or 1 level TLB, first level is data TLB and instruction TLB, second level is shared TLB for both data and instructions. For hupe page TLB, usually there is just one level and seperated by 2MB/4MB and 1GB. Although each levels TLB size is important for performance tuning, but for genernal and rude optimizing, last level TLB entry number is suitable. And in fact, last level TLB always has the biggest entry number. This patch will get the biggest TLB entry number and use it in furture TLB optimizing. Accroding Borislav's suggestion, except tlb_ll[i/d]_* array, other function and data will be released after system boot up. For all kinds of x86 vendor friendly, vendor specific code was moved to its specific files. Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1340845344-27557-2-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2011-12-09x86, CPU: Drop superfluous get_cpu_cap() prototypeBorislav Petkov
The get_cpu_cap() external function prototype was declared twice so lose one of them. Clean up the header guard while at it. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1322594083-14507-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-08-05x86: Add a BSP cpu_dev helperBorislav Petkov
Add a function ptr to struct cpu_dev which is destined to be run only once on the BSP during boot. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110805180116.GB26217@aftab Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2010-10-21Merge branch 'x86-cpu-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip * 'x86-cpu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip: x86, cpu: Fix X86_FEATURE_NOPL x86, cpu: Re-run get_cpu_cap() after adjusting the CPUID level
2010-09-28x86, cpu: After uncapping CPUID, re-run CPU feature detectionH. Peter Anvin
After uncapping the CPUID level, we need to also re-run the CPU feature detection code. This resolves kernel bugzilla 16322. Reported-by: boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> v2.6.29..2.6.35 LKML-Reference: <tip-@git.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2010-09-21x86, cpu: Re-run get_cpu_cap() after adjusting the CPUID levelH. Peter Anvin
At least on Intel, adjusting the max CPUID level can expose new CPUID features, so we need to re-run get_cpu_cap() after changing the CPUID level. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2009-11-23x86, cpu: mv display_cacheinfo -> cpu_detect_cache_sizesBorislav Petkov
display_cacheinfo() doesn't display anything anymore and it is used to detect CPU cache sizes. Rename it accordingly. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <20091121130145.GA31357@liondog.tnic> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2009-03-22x86: cpu/cpu.h cleanupJaswinder Singh Rajput
Impact: cleanup - Fix various style issues Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
2009-03-12x86: move various CPU initialization objects into .cpuinit.rodataJan Beulich
Impact: debuggability and micro-optimization Putting whatever is possible into the (final) .rodata section increases the likelihood of catching memory corruption bugs early, and reduces false cache line sharing. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> LKML-Reference: <49B90961.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-06x86: remove duplicated get_model_name() callingYinghai Lu
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-04x86: remove cpu_vendor_devYinghai Lu
1. add c_x86_vendor into cpu_dev 2. change cpu_devs to static 3. check c_x86_vendor before put that cpu_dev into array 4. remove alignment for 64bit 5. order the sequence in cpu_devs according to link sequence... so could put intel at first, then amd... Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: make 64-bit identify_cpu use cpu_devYinghai Lu
we may need to move some functions to common.c later Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08x86: Move PCI IO ECS code to x86/pciRobert Richter
"Form follows function". Code is now where it belongs to. Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-10fix build bug in "x86: add PCI extended config space access for AMD Barcelona"Robert Richter
Also much less code now. Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-04-17x86: use ELF section to list CPU vendor specific codeThomas Petazzoni
Replace the hardcoded list of initialization functions for each CPU vendor by a list in an ELF section, which is read at initialization in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.c to fill the cpu_devs[] array. The ELF section, named .x86cpuvendor.init, is reclaimed after boot, and contains entries of type "struct cpu_vendor_dev" which associates a vendor number with a pointer to a "struct cpu_dev" structure. This first modification allows to remove all the VENDOR_init_cpu() functions. This patch also removes the hardcoded calls to early_init_amd() and early_init_intel(). Instead, we add a "c_early_init" member to the cpu_dev structure, which is then called if not NULL by the generic CPU initialization code. Unfortunately, in early_cpu_detect(), this_cpu is not yet set, so we have to use the cpu_devs[] array directly. This patch is part of the Linux Tiny project, and is needed for further patch that will allow to disable compilation of unused CPU support code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-02-04x86: add cpu init function defintions to cpu.hHarvey Harrison
cpu.h was already included everywhere needed. Fixes following sparse warnings: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c:343:12: warning: symbol 'amd_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c:444:12: warning: symbol 'cyrix_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c:456:12: warning: symbol 'nsc_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c:467:12: warning: symbol 'centaur_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/cpu/transmeta.c:112:12: warning: symbol 'transmeta_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c:296:12: warning: symbol 'intel_cpu_init' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/cpu/nexgen.c:56:12: warning: symbol 'nexgen_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/cpu/umc.c:22:12: warning: symbol 'umc_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86: move X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC into early cpu feature detectionAndi Kleen
Need this in the next patch in time_init and that happens early. This includes a minor fix on i386 where early_intel_workarounds() [which is now called early_init_intel] really executes early as the comments say. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-11i386: move kernel/cpuThomas Gleixner
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>