summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>2015-07-27 05:55:16 (GMT)
committerCorey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>2015-09-03 20:02:29 (GMT)
commit06e5e345fea8df24b1d935f98741343df4cab664 (patch)
tree7ba5bd37d180c796b1518199c057af065d9450c0
parent82802f968bd3118af04eaeb3814c21d9813be527 (diff)
downloadlinux-06e5e345fea8df24b1d935f98741343df4cab664.tar.xz
ipmi: Avoid touching possible corrupted lists in the panic context
When processing queued messages in the panic context, IPMI driver tries to do it without any locking to avoid deadlocks. However, this means we can touch a corrupted list if the kernel panicked while manipulating the list. Fortunately, current `add-tail and del-from-head' style implementation won't touch the corrupted part, but it is inherently risky. To get rid of the risk, this patch re-initializes the message lists on panic if the related spinlock has already been acquired. As the result, we may lose queued messages, but it's not so painful. Dropping messages on the received message list is also less problematic because no one can respond the received messages. Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Fixed a comment typo. Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c17
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
index 6e191ff..cdac5f7 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -4511,6 +4511,23 @@ static int panic_event(struct notifier_block *this,
/* Interface is not ready. */
continue;
+ /*
+ * If we were interrupted while locking xmit_msgs_lock or
+ * waiting_rcv_msgs_lock, the corresponding list may be
+ * corrupted. In this case, drop items on the list for
+ * the safety.
+ */
+ if (!spin_trylock(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock)) {
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->xmit_msgs);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->hp_xmit_msgs);
+ } else
+ spin_unlock(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock);
+
+ if (!spin_trylock(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs_lock))
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs);
+ else
+ spin_unlock(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs_lock);
+
intf->run_to_completion = 1;
intf->handlers->set_run_to_completion(intf->send_info, 1);
}