summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/README
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>2011-11-15 22:36:09 (GMT)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2011-11-16 00:41:51 (GMT)
commit66e13e66b6c4e5b2ecd6225e1f8437640cfb6498 (patch)
treef84eda181ba94a3d9040e0f14399bd426dfc02be /README
parent5aecc85abdb9ac2b0e6548d13652a34142e7ae89 (diff)
downloadlinux-66e13e66b6c4e5b2ecd6225e1f8437640cfb6498.tar.xz
drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c: make dmi_name_in_vendors more focused
The current implementation of dmi_name_in_vendors() is an invitation to lazy coding and false positives [1]. Searching for a string in 8 know what you're looking for, so you should know where to look. strstr isn't fast, especially when it fails, so we should avoid calling it when it just can't succeed. Looking at the current users of the function, it seems clear to me that they are looking for a system or board vendor name, so let's limit dmi_name_in_vendors to these two DMI fields. This much better matches the function name, BTW. [1] We currently have code looking for short names in DMI data, such as "IBM", "ASUS" or "Acer". I let you guess what will happen the day other vendors ship products named, for example, "SCHREIBMEISTER", "PEGASUS" or "Acerola". Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'README')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions