summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>2006-08-27 11:42:08 (GMT)
committerRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>2006-08-27 11:42:08 (GMT)
commit7c6f25141b88b5e926f9d43932ce668602d611ae (patch)
tree50553a8e12aa4918eb3723ba3682e9ba2ca1e025 /arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
parent3a13813e6effcfad5910d47b15b724621b50b878 (diff)
downloadlinux-7c6f25141b88b5e926f9d43932ce668602d611ae.tar.xz
[ARM] 3748/3: Correct error check in vfp_raise_exceptions
Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz The recent fix to hide VFP_NAN_FLAG broke the check in vfp_raise_exceptions; it would attempt to deliver an exception mask of 0xfffffeff instead of reporting a serious error condition using printk. Define a safe constant to use for an invalid exception maskm, and use it at both ends. Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
index 9d265d5..4178f6c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_
pr_debug("VFP: raising exceptions %08x\n", exceptions);
- if (exceptions == (u32)-1) {
+ if (exceptions == VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR) {
vfp_panic("unhandled bounce");
vfp_raise_sigfpe(0, regs);
return;
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_
*/
static u32 vfp_emulate_instruction(u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- u32 exceptions = (u32)-1;
+ u32 exceptions = VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR;
pr_debug("VFP: emulate: INST=0x%08x SCR=0x%08x\n", inst, fpscr);