Merge tag 'iommu-updates-v4.4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu

Pull iommu updates from Joerg Roedel:
 "This time including:

   - A new IOMMU driver for s390 pci devices

   - Common dma-ops support based on iommu-api for ARM64.  The plan is
     to use this as a basis for ARM32 and hopefully other architectures
     as well in the future.

   - MSI support for ARM-SMMUv3

   - Cleanups and dead code removal in the AMD IOMMU driver

   - Better RMRR handling for the Intel VT-d driver

   - Various other cleanups and small fixes"

* tag 'iommu-updates-v4.4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu: (41 commits)
  iommu/vt-d: Fix return value check of parse_ioapics_under_ir()
  iommu/vt-d: Propagate error-value from ir_parse_ioapic_hpet_scope()
  iommu/vt-d: Adjust the return value of the parse_ioapics_under_ir
  iommu: Move default domain allocation to iommu_group_get_for_dev()
  iommu: Remove is_pci_dev() fall-back from iommu_group_get_for_dev
  iommu/arm-smmu: Switch to device_group call-back
  iommu/fsl: Convert to device_group call-back
  iommu: Add device_group call-back to x86 iommu drivers
  iommu: Add generic_device_group() function
  iommu: Export and rename iommu_group_get_for_pci_dev()
  iommu: Revive device_group iommu-ops call-back
  iommu/amd: Remove find_last_devid_on_pci()
  iommu/amd: Remove first/last_device handling
  iommu/amd: Initialize amd_iommu_last_bdf for DEV_ALL
  iommu/amd: Cleanup buffer allocation
  iommu/amd: Remove cmd_buf_size and evt_buf_size from struct amd_iommu
  iommu/amd: Align DTE flag definitions
  iommu/amd: Remove old alias handling code
  iommu/amd: Set alias DTE in do_attach/do_detach
  iommu/amd: WARN when __[attach|detach]_device are called with irqs enabled
  ...

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
index 37505b8..37d10f7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static int zpci_refresh_global(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
 				  zdev->iommu_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
 }
 
-static unsigned long *dma_alloc_cpu_table(void)
+unsigned long *dma_alloc_cpu_table(void)
 {
 	unsigned long *table, *entry;
 
@@ -114,12 +114,12 @@ static unsigned long *dma_walk_cpu_trans(unsigned long *rto, dma_addr_t dma_addr
 	return &pto[px];
 }
 
-static void dma_update_cpu_trans(struct zpci_dev *zdev, void *page_addr,
-				 dma_addr_t dma_addr, int flags)
+void dma_update_cpu_trans(unsigned long *dma_table, void *page_addr,
+			  dma_addr_t dma_addr, int flags)
 {
 	unsigned long *entry;
 
-	entry = dma_walk_cpu_trans(zdev->dma_table, dma_addr);
+	entry = dma_walk_cpu_trans(dma_table, dma_addr);
 	if (!entry) {
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 		return;
@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ static int dma_update_trans(struct zpci_dev *zdev, unsigned long pa,
 		goto no_refresh;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
-		dma_update_cpu_trans(zdev, page_addr, dma_addr, flags);
+		dma_update_cpu_trans(zdev->dma_table, page_addr, dma_addr,
+				     flags);
 		page_addr += PAGE_SIZE;
 		dma_addr += PAGE_SIZE;
 	}
@@ -181,7 +182,7 @@ no_refresh:
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static void dma_free_seg_table(unsigned long entry)
+void dma_free_seg_table(unsigned long entry)
 {
 	unsigned long *sto = get_rt_sto(entry);
 	int sx;
@@ -193,21 +194,18 @@ static void dma_free_seg_table(unsigned long entry)
 	dma_free_cpu_table(sto);
 }
 
-static void dma_cleanup_tables(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
+void dma_cleanup_tables(unsigned long *table)
 {
-	unsigned long *table;
 	int rtx;
 
-	if (!zdev || !zdev->dma_table)
+	if (!table)
 		return;
 
-	table = zdev->dma_table;
 	for (rtx = 0; rtx < ZPCI_TABLE_ENTRIES; rtx++)
 		if (reg_entry_isvalid(table[rtx]))
 			dma_free_seg_table(table[rtx]);
 
 	dma_free_cpu_table(table);
-	zdev->dma_table = NULL;
 }
 
 static unsigned long __dma_alloc_iommu(struct zpci_dev *zdev,
@@ -416,6 +414,13 @@ int zpci_dma_init_device(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
 {
 	int rc;
 
+	/*
+	 * At this point, if the device is part of an IOMMU domain, this would
+	 * be a strong hint towards a bug in the IOMMU API (common) code and/or
+	 * simultaneous access via IOMMU and DMA API. So let's issue a warning.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON(zdev->s390_domain);
+
 	spin_lock_init(&zdev->iommu_bitmap_lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&zdev->dma_table_lock);
 
@@ -450,8 +455,16 @@ out_clean:
 
 void zpci_dma_exit_device(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
 {
+	/*
+	 * At this point, if the device is part of an IOMMU domain, this would
+	 * be a strong hint towards a bug in the IOMMU API (common) code and/or
+	 * simultaneous access via IOMMU and DMA API. So let's issue a warning.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON(zdev->s390_domain);
+
 	zpci_unregister_ioat(zdev, 0);
-	dma_cleanup_tables(zdev);
+	dma_cleanup_tables(zdev->dma_table);
+	zdev->dma_table = NULL;
 	vfree(zdev->iommu_bitmap);
 	zdev->iommu_bitmap = NULL;
 	zdev->next_bit = 0;