mm: arch: make in_gate_area take an mm_struct instead of a task_struct

Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be asked
with respect to an mm, not a particular task.  Moreover, dropping the dependency
on task_struct will help make existing and future operations on mm's more
flexible and convenient.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Wilson <wilsons@start.ca>
Reviewed-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index dd4809b..43c4416 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -870,9 +870,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct *get_gate_vma(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	return &gate_vma;
 }
 
-int in_gate_area(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long addr)
+int in_gate_area(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 {
-	struct vm_area_struct *vma = get_gate_vma(task->mm);
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma = get_gate_vma(mm);
 
 	if (!vma)
 		return 0;