summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>2009-03-23 19:07:20 (GMT)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2009-03-24 09:42:35 (GMT)
commit9cdec049389ce2c324fd1ec508a71528a27d4a07 (patch)
tree835f702631f2daeda8742c2784ee25018039d313 /arch/x86/pci/i386.c
parent7f00a2495bf5b98b097c47be5d6e2d4114ec39bf (diff)
downloadlinux-9cdec049389ce2c324fd1ec508a71528a27d4a07.tar.xz
x86, PAT, PCI: Change vma prot in pci_mmap to reflect inherited prot
While looking at the issue in the thread: http://marc.info/?l=dri-devel&m=123606627824556&w=2 noticed a bug in pci PAT code and memory type setting. PCI mmap code did not set the proper protection in vma, when it inherited protection in reserve_memtype. This bug only affects the case where there exists a WC mapping before X does an mmap with /proc or /sys pci interface. This will cause X userlevel mmap from /proc or /sysfs to fail on fork. Reported-by: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <20090323190720.GA16831@linux-os.sc.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/pci/i386.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/pci/i386.c3
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
index 5ead808..f234a37 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
@@ -319,6 +319,9 @@ int pci_mmap_page_range(struct pci_dev *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
return -EINVAL;
}
flags = new_flags;
+ vma->vm_page_prot = __pgprot(
+ (pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) & ~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK) |
+ flags);
}
if (((vma->vm_pgoff < max_low_pfn_mapped) ||