summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg2.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>2010-04-06 06:52:37 (GMT)
committerLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>2010-04-20 14:43:16 (GMT)
commit0f849d2cc6863c7874889ea60a871fb71399dd3f (patch)
treec8c14ac12dfc92c7147a049e5374d3a9036247b7 /drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg2.c
parentaa2110cb1a7510f9b834adfb39b05d4843a35d35 (diff)
downloadlinux-0f849d2cc6863c7874889ea60a871fb71399dd3f.tar.xz
ACPICA: Minimize the differences between linux GPE code and ACPICA code base
We have ported Rafael's major GPE changes (ACPI: Use GPE reference counting to support shared GPEs) into ACPICA code base. But the port and Rafael's original patch have some differences, so we made below patch to make linux GPE code consistent with ACPICA code base. Most changes are about comments and coding styles. Other noticeable changes are based on: Rafael: Reduce code duplication related to GPE lookup https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/86237/ Rafael: Always use the same lock for GPE locking https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90471/ A new field gpe_count in struct acpi_gpe_block_info to record the number of individual GPEs in block. Rename acpi_ev_save_method_info to acpi_ev_match_gpe_method. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg2.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg2.c27
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg2.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg2.c
index 3f3f48b..10e104c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg2.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg2.c
@@ -119,33 +119,6 @@ acpi_status acpi_ex_opcode_2A_0T_0R(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state)
status = AE_AML_OPERAND_TYPE;
break;
}
-#ifdef ACPI_GPE_NOTIFY_CHECK
- /*
- * GPE method wake/notify check. Here, we want to ensure that we
- * don't receive any "DeviceWake" Notifies from a GPE _Lxx or _Exx
- * GPE method during system runtime. If we do, the GPE is marked
- * as "wake-only" and disabled.
- *
- * 1) Is the Notify() value == device_wake?
- * 2) Is this a GPE deferred method? (An _Lxx or _Exx method)
- * 3) Did the original GPE happen at system runtime?
- * (versus during wake)
- *
- * If all three cases are true, this is a wake-only GPE that should
- * be disabled at runtime.
- */
- if (value == 2) { /* device_wake */
- status =
- acpi_ev_check_for_wake_only_gpe(walk_state->
- gpe_event_info);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
-
- /* AE_WAKE_ONLY_GPE only error, means ignore this notify */
-
- return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_OK)
- }
- }
-#endif
/*
* Dispatch the notify to the appropriate handler