diff options
author | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> | 2012-01-27 17:12:32 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> | 2012-05-28 22:10:57 (GMT) |
commit | a7d7d2e1a07e3811dc49af2962c940fd8bbb6c8f (patch) | |
tree | 6c3ac39bf25fb7810668f57476c7b5872d5b418b /drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | |
parent | 76e10d158efb6d4516018846f60c2ab5501900bc (diff) | |
download | linux-a7d7d2e1a07e3811dc49af2962c940fd8bbb6c8f.tar.xz |
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it
The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're
linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see
csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's
on FBDIMM's, for example.
This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create
a mess under csrow/channel original's concept.
Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there
the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel.
Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the
memory architecture.
All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location.
Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as
they also fake the csrows internally.
TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on
csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory
rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different
labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch
is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info
struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM.
The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that
will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of
memory architectures.
Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com>
Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com>
Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com>
Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/edac/edac_mc.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 47 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c index feef773..c1aae72 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static void edac_mc_dump_channel(struct rank_info *chan) debugf4("\tchannel = %p\n", chan); debugf4("\tchannel->chan_idx = %d\n", chan->chan_idx); debugf4("\tchannel->ce_count = %d\n", chan->ce_count); - debugf4("\tchannel->label = '%s'\n", chan->label); + debugf4("\tchannel->label = '%s'\n", chan->dimm->label); debugf4("\tchannel->csrow = %p\n\n", chan->csrow); } @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows, struct mem_ctl_info *mci; struct csrow_info *csi, *csrow; struct rank_info *chi, *chp, *chan; + struct dimm_info *dimm; void *pvt; unsigned size; int row, chn; @@ -170,7 +171,8 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows, mci = (struct mem_ctl_info *)0; csi = edac_align_ptr(&mci[1], sizeof(*csi)); chi = edac_align_ptr(&csi[nr_csrows], sizeof(*chi)); - pvt = edac_align_ptr(&chi[nr_chans * nr_csrows], sz_pvt); + dimm = edac_align_ptr(&chi[nr_chans * nr_csrows], sizeof(*dimm)); + pvt = edac_align_ptr(&dimm[nr_chans * nr_csrows], sz_pvt); size = ((unsigned long)pvt) + sz_pvt; mci = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); @@ -182,14 +184,22 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows, */ csi = (struct csrow_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)csi)); chi = (struct rank_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)chi)); + dimm = (struct dimm_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)dimm)); pvt = sz_pvt ? (((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)pvt)) : NULL; /* setup index and various internal pointers */ mci->mc_idx = edac_index; mci->csrows = csi; + mci->dimms = dimm; mci->pvt_info = pvt; mci->nr_csrows = nr_csrows; + /* + * For now, assumes that a per-csrow arrangement for dimms. + * This will be latter changed. + */ + dimm = mci->dimms; + for (row = 0; row < nr_csrows; row++) { csrow = &csi[row]; csrow->csrow_idx = row; @@ -202,6 +212,12 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows, chan = &chp[chn]; chan->chan_idx = chn; chan->csrow = csrow; + + mci->csrows[row].channels[chn].dimm = dimm; + dimm->csrow = row; + dimm->csrow_channel = chn; + dimm++; + mci->nr_dimms++; } } @@ -678,6 +694,7 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, int row, int channel, const char *msg) { unsigned long remapped_page; + char *label = NULL; debugf3("MC%d: %s()\n", mci->mc_idx, __func__); @@ -701,6 +718,8 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, return; } + label = mci->csrows[row].channels[channel].dimm->label; + if (edac_mc_get_log_ce()) /* FIXME - put in DIMM location */ edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING, @@ -708,7 +727,7 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, "0x%lx, row %d, channel %d, label \"%s\": %s\n", page_frame_number, offset_in_page, mci->csrows[row].grain, syndrome, row, channel, - mci->csrows[row].channels[channel].label, msg); + label, msg); mci->ce_count++; mci->csrows[row].ce_count++; @@ -754,6 +773,7 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, char *pos = labels; int chan; int chars; + char *label = NULL; debugf3("MC%d: %s()\n", mci->mc_idx, __func__); @@ -767,15 +787,15 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, return; } - chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "%s", - mci->csrows[row].channels[0].label); + label = mci->csrows[row].channels[0].dimm->label; + chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "%s", label); len -= chars; pos += chars; for (chan = 1; (chan < mci->csrows[row].nr_channels) && (len > 0); chan++) { - chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, ":%s", - mci->csrows[row].channels[chan].label); + label = mci->csrows[row].channels[chan].dimm->label; + chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, ":%s", label); len -= chars; pos += chars; } @@ -824,6 +844,7 @@ void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, char labels[len + 1]; char *pos = labels; int chars; + char *label; if (csrow >= mci->nr_csrows) { /* something is wrong */ @@ -858,12 +879,12 @@ void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, mci->csrows[csrow].ue_count++; /* Generate the DIMM labels from the specified channels */ - chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "%s", - mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channela].label); + label = mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channela].dimm->label; + chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "%s", label); len -= chars; pos += chars; chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "-%s", - mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channelb].label); + mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channelb].dimm->label); if (edac_mc_get_log_ue()) edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_EMERG, @@ -885,6 +906,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(edac_mc_handle_fbd_ue); void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned int csrow, unsigned int channel, char *msg) { + char *label = NULL; /* Ensure boundary values */ if (csrow >= mci->nr_csrows) { @@ -904,12 +926,13 @@ void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, return; } + label = mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channel].dimm->label; + if (edac_mc_get_log_ce()) /* FIXME - put in DIMM location */ edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING, "CE row %d, channel %d, label \"%s\": %s\n", - csrow, channel, - mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channel].label, msg); + csrow, channel, label, msg); mci->ce_count++; mci->csrows[csrow].ce_count++; |