summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/staging
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLiang Zhen <liang.zhen@intel.com>2015-11-04 18:40:05 (GMT)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2015-11-16 04:02:47 (GMT)
commit9d3e85326f4c3c65a7e97c5406611a17142bd70f (patch)
tree312ec516c3c9a4388b8b3c59cf05987add8e9b02 /drivers/staging
parent78368d578e9eab8dc9d42b9e9a2be78a98f4e9d9 (diff)
downloadlinux-9d3e85326f4c3c65a7e97c5406611a17142bd70f.tar.xz
staging: lustre: remove page_collection::pc_lock in libcfs
page_collection::pc_lock is supposed to protect race between functions called by smp_call_function(), however we don't have this use-case for ages and page_collection only lives in stack of thread, so it is safe to remove it. Signed-off-by: Liang Zhen <liang.zhen@intel.com> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3055 Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/7660 Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam <bobijam@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastien Buisson <sebastien.buisson@bull.net> Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/staging')
-rw-r--r--drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.c14
-rw-r--r--drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.h8
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.c
index f99d30f..c27e320 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.c
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ static void cfs_tcd_shrink(struct cfs_trace_cpu_data *tcd)
pgcount + 1, tcd->tcd_cur_pages);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pc.pc_pages);
- spin_lock_init(&pc.pc_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(tage, tmp, &tcd->tcd_pages, linkage) {
if (pgcount-- == 0)
@@ -522,7 +521,6 @@ static void collect_pages_on_all_cpus(struct page_collection *pc)
struct cfs_trace_cpu_data *tcd;
int i, cpu;
- spin_lock(&pc->pc_lock);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
cfs_tcd_for_each_type_lock(tcd, i, cpu) {
list_splice_init(&tcd->tcd_pages, &pc->pc_pages);
@@ -534,7 +532,6 @@ static void collect_pages_on_all_cpus(struct page_collection *pc)
}
}
}
- spin_unlock(&pc->pc_lock);
}
static void collect_pages(struct page_collection *pc)
@@ -555,7 +552,6 @@ static void put_pages_back_on_all_cpus(struct page_collection *pc)
struct cfs_trace_page *tmp;
int i, cpu;
- spin_lock(&pc->pc_lock);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
cfs_tcd_for_each_type_lock(tcd, i, cpu) {
cur_head = tcd->tcd_pages.next;
@@ -573,7 +569,6 @@ static void put_pages_back_on_all_cpus(struct page_collection *pc)
}
}
}
- spin_unlock(&pc->pc_lock);
}
static void put_pages_back(struct page_collection *pc)
@@ -592,7 +587,6 @@ static void put_pages_on_tcd_daemon_list(struct page_collection *pc,
struct cfs_trace_page *tage;
struct cfs_trace_page *tmp;
- spin_lock(&pc->pc_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(tage, tmp, &pc->pc_pages, linkage) {
__LASSERT_TAGE_INVARIANT(tage);
@@ -616,7 +610,6 @@ static void put_pages_on_tcd_daemon_list(struct page_collection *pc,
tcd->tcd_cur_daemon_pages--;
}
}
- spin_unlock(&pc->pc_lock);
}
static void put_pages_on_daemon_list(struct page_collection *pc)
@@ -636,8 +629,6 @@ void cfs_trace_debug_print(void)
struct cfs_trace_page *tage;
struct cfs_trace_page *tmp;
- spin_lock_init(&pc.pc_lock);
-
pc.pc_want_daemon_pages = 1;
collect_pages(&pc);
list_for_each_entry_safe(tage, tmp, &pc.pc_pages, linkage) {
@@ -692,7 +683,6 @@ int cfs_tracefile_dump_all_pages(char *filename)
goto out;
}
- spin_lock_init(&pc.pc_lock);
pc.pc_want_daemon_pages = 1;
collect_pages(&pc);
if (list_empty(&pc.pc_pages)) {
@@ -739,8 +729,6 @@ void cfs_trace_flush_pages(void)
struct cfs_trace_page *tage;
struct cfs_trace_page *tmp;
- spin_lock_init(&pc.pc_lock);
-
pc.pc_want_daemon_pages = 1;
collect_pages(&pc);
list_for_each_entry_safe(tage, tmp, &pc.pc_pages, linkage) {
@@ -970,7 +958,6 @@ static int tracefiled(void *arg)
/* we're started late enough that we pick up init's fs context */
/* this is so broken in uml? what on earth is going on? */
- spin_lock_init(&pc.pc_lock);
complete(&tctl->tctl_start);
while (1) {
@@ -1170,7 +1157,6 @@ static void cfs_trace_cleanup(void)
struct page_collection pc;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pc.pc_pages);
- spin_lock_init(&pc.pc_lock);
trace_cleanup_on_all_cpus();
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.h
index 73d60e0..e5fbeec 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/tracefile.h
@@ -196,14 +196,6 @@ extern union cfs_trace_data_union (*cfs_trace_data[TCD_MAX_TYPES])[NR_CPUS];
struct page_collection {
struct list_head pc_pages;
/*
- * spin-lock protecting ->pc_pages. It is taken by smp_call_function()
- * call-back functions. XXX nikita: Which is horrible: all processors
- * receive NMI at the same time only to be serialized by this
- * lock. Probably ->pc_pages should be replaced with an array of
- * NR_CPUS elements accessed locklessly.
- */
- spinlock_t pc_lock;
- /*
* if this flag is set, collect_pages() will spill both
* ->tcd_daemon_pages and ->tcd_pages to the ->pc_pages. Otherwise,
* only ->tcd_pages are spilled.