diff options
author | Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> | 2013-05-21 08:02:00 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> | 2013-05-30 22:10:56 (GMT) |
commit | 08fb39051f5581df45ae2a20c6cf2d0c4cddf7c2 (patch) | |
tree | 858c00c8c52004aba5de4ff6305440052a6829f6 /firmware | |
parent | 7ae077802c9f12959a81fa1a16c1ec2842dbae05 (diff) | |
download | linux-08fb39051f5581df45ae2a20c6cf2d0c4cddf7c2.tar.xz |
xfs: avoid nesting transactions in xfs_qm_scall_setqlim()
Lockdep reports:
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.9.0+ #3 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
setquota/28368 is trying to acquire lock:
(sb_internal){++++.?}, at: [<c11e8846>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x26/0x50
but task is already holding lock:
(sb_internal){++++.?}, at: [<c11e8846>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x26/0x50
from xfs_qm_scall_setqlim()->xfs_dqread() when a dquot needs to be
allocated.
xfs_qm_scall_setqlim() is starting a transaction and then not
passing it into xfs_qm_dqet() and so it starts it's own transaction
when allocating the dquot. Splat!
Fix this by not allocating the dquot in xfs_qm_scall_setqlim()
inside the setqlim transaction. This requires getting the dquot
first (and allocating it if necessary) then dropping and relocking
the dquot before joining it to the setqlim transaction.
Reported-by: Michael L. Semon <mlsemon35@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
(cherry picked from commit f648167f3ac79018c210112508c732ea9bf67c7b)
Diffstat (limited to 'firmware')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions