summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/jffs2
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>2016-03-05 01:19:23 (GMT)
committerBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>2016-03-07 21:51:11 (GMT)
commit9ebfdf5b18493f338237ef9861a555c2f79b0c17 (patch)
tree0e1c2041a5cad1919cca33f3153de9e932bec986 /fs/jffs2
parent3707b2c3d21f7c9f8c6aadba79ef012f0bbad10c (diff)
downloadlinux-9ebfdf5b18493f338237ef9861a555c2f79b0c17.tar.xz
mtd: nand: check status before reporting timeout
In commit b70af9bef49b ("mtd: nand: increase ready wait timeout and report timeouts"), we increased the likelihood of scheduling during nand_wait(). This makes us more likely to hit the time_before(...) condition, since a lot of time may pass before we get scheduled again. Now, the loop was already buggy, since we don't check if the NAND is ready after exiting the loop; we simply print out a timeout warning. Fix this by doing a final status check before printing a timeout message. This isn't actually a critical bug, since the only effect is a false warning print. But too many prints never hurt anyone, did they? :) Side note: perhaps I'm not smart enough, but I'm not sure what the best policy is for this kind of loop; do we busy loop (i.e., no cond_resched()) to keep the lowest I/O latency (it's not great if the resched is delaying Richard's system ~400ms)? Or do we allow rescheduling, to play nice with the rest of the system (since some operations can take quite a while)? Reported-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@imgtec.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/jffs2')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions