kernel: Move arches to use common unaligned access

Unaligned access is ok for the following arches:
cris, m68k, mn10300, powerpc, s390, x86

Arches that use the memmove implementation for native endian, and
the byteshifting for the opposite endianness.
h8300, m32r, xtensa

Packed struct for native endian, byteshifting for other endian:
alpha, blackfin, ia64, parisc, sparc, sparc64, mips, sh

m86knommu is generic_be for Coldfire, otherwise unaligned access is ok.

frv, arm chooses endianness based on compiler settings, uses the byteshifting
versions.  Remove the unaligned trap handler from frv as it is now unused.

v850 is le, uses the byteshifting versions for both be and le.

Remove the now unused asm-generic implementation.

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 168 deletions

diff --git a/include/asm-arm/unaligned.h b/include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
index 5db03cf..44593a8 100644
--- a/include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
@@ -1,171 +1,9 @@
-#ifndef __ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H
-#define __ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H
+#ifndef _ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H
+#define _ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H
 
-#include <asm/types.h>
-
-extern int __bug_unaligned_x(const void *ptr);
-
-/*
- * What is the most efficient way of loading/storing an unaligned value?
- *
- * That is the subject of this file.  Efficiency here is defined as
- * minimum code size with minimum register usage for the common cases.
- * It is currently not believed that long longs are common, so we
- * trade efficiency for the chars, shorts and longs against the long
- * longs.
- *
- * Current stats with gcc 2.7.2.2 for these functions:
- *
- *	ptrsize	get:	code	regs	put:	code	regs
- *	1		1	1		1	2
- *	2		3	2		3	2
- *	4		7	3		7	3
- *	8		20	6		16	6
- *
- * gcc 2.95.1 seems to code differently:
- *
- *	ptrsize	get:	code	regs	put:	code	regs
- *	1		1	1		1	2
- *	2		3	2		3	2
- *	4		7	4		7	4
- *	8		19	8		15	6
- *
- * which may or may not be more efficient (depending upon whether
- * you can afford the extra registers).  Hopefully the gcc 2.95
- * is inteligent enough to decide if it is better to use the
- * extra register, but evidence so far seems to suggest otherwise.
- *
- * Unfortunately, gcc is not able to optimise the high word
- * out of long long >> 32, or the low word from long long << 32
- */
-
-#define __get_unaligned_2_le(__p)					\
-	(unsigned int)(__p[0] | __p[1] << 8)
-
-#define __get_unaligned_2_be(__p)					\
-	(unsigned int)(__p[0] << 8 | __p[1])
-
-#define __get_unaligned_4_le(__p)					\
-	(unsigned int)(__p[0] | __p[1] << 8 | __p[2] << 16 | __p[3] << 24)
-
-#define __get_unaligned_4_be(__p)					\
-	(unsigned int)(__p[0] << 24 | __p[1] << 16 | __p[2] << 8 | __p[3])
-
-#define __get_unaligned_8_le(__p)					\
-	((unsigned long long)__get_unaligned_4_le((__p+4)) << 32 |	\
-		__get_unaligned_4_le(__p))
-
-#define __get_unaligned_8_be(__p)					\
-	((unsigned long long)__get_unaligned_4_be(__p) << 32 |		\
-		__get_unaligned_4_be((__p+4)))
-
-#define __get_unaligned_le(ptr)						\
-	((__force typeof(*(ptr)))({					\
-		const __u8 *__p = (const __u8 *)(ptr);			\
-		__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 1, *__p,	\
-		  __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 2, __get_unaligned_2_le(__p),	\
-		  __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 4, __get_unaligned_4_le(__p),	\
-		  __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 8, __get_unaligned_8_le(__p),	\
-		    (void)__bug_unaligned_x(__p)))));			\
-	}))
-
-#define __get_unaligned_be(ptr)						\
-	((__force typeof(*(ptr)))({					\
-		const __u8 *__p = (const __u8 *)(ptr);			\
-		__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 1, *__p,	\
-		  __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 2, __get_unaligned_2_be(__p),	\
-		  __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 4, __get_unaligned_4_be(__p),	\
-		  __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 8, __get_unaligned_8_be(__p),	\
-		    (void)__bug_unaligned_x(__p)))));			\
-	}))
-
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_2_le(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
-	*__p++ = __v;
-	*__p++ = __v >> 8;
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_2_be(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
-	*__p++ = __v >> 8;
-	*__p++ = __v;
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_4_le(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
-	__put_unaligned_2_le(__v >> 16, __p + 2);
-	__put_unaligned_2_le(__v, __p);
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_4_be(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
-	__put_unaligned_2_be(__v >> 16, __p);
-	__put_unaligned_2_be(__v, __p + 2);
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_8_le(const unsigned long long __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
-	/*
-	 * tradeoff: 8 bytes of stack for all unaligned puts (2
-	 * instructions), or an extra register in the long long
-	 * case - go for the extra register.
-	 */
-	__put_unaligned_4_le(__v >> 32, __p+4);
-	__put_unaligned_4_le(__v, __p);
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_8_be(const unsigned long long __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
-	/*
-	 * tradeoff: 8 bytes of stack for all unaligned puts (2
-	 * instructions), or an extra register in the long long
-	 * case - go for the extra register.
-	 */
-	__put_unaligned_4_be(__v >> 32, __p);
-	__put_unaligned_4_be(__v, __p+4);
-}
-
-/*
- * Try to store an unaligned value as efficiently as possible.
- */
-#define __put_unaligned_le(val,ptr)					\
-	({							\
-		(void)sizeof(*(ptr) = (val));			\
-		switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) {			\
-		case 1:						\
-			*(ptr) = (val);				\
-			break;					\
-		case 2: __put_unaligned_2_le((__force u16)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr));	\
-			break;					\
-		case 4:	__put_unaligned_4_le((__force u32)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr));	\
-			break;					\
-		case 8:	__put_unaligned_8_le((__force u64)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
-			break;					\
-		default: __bug_unaligned_x(ptr);		\
-			break;					\
-		}						\
-		(void) 0;					\
-	})
-
-#define __put_unaligned_be(val,ptr)					\
-	({							\
-		(void)sizeof(*(ptr) = (val));			\
-		switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) {			\
-		case 1:						\
-			*(ptr) = (val);				\
-			break;					\
-		case 2: __put_unaligned_2_be((__force u16)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr));	\
-			break;					\
-		case 4:	__put_unaligned_4_be((__force u32)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr));	\
-			break;					\
-		case 8:	__put_unaligned_8_be((__force u64)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
-			break;					\
-		default: __bug_unaligned_x(ptr);		\
-			break;					\
-		}						\
-		(void) 0;					\
-	})
+#include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
 
 /*
  * Select endianness
@@ -178,4 +16,4 @@ static inline void __put_unaligned_8_be(const unsigned long long __v, register _
 #define put_unaligned	__put_unaligned_be
 #endif
 
-#endif
+#endif /* _ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H */