diff options
author | Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> | 2008-01-30 12:30:33 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2008-01-30 12:30:33 (GMT) |
commit | 2fed0c507cf0101d511366f36e8573f403dbfea5 (patch) | |
tree | d73332fca3b4a515755ad10b313780ca54f84fc1 /include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h | |
parent | 6abcd98ffafbff81f0bfd7ee1d129e634af13245 (diff) | |
download | linux-2fed0c507cf0101d511366f36e8573f403dbfea5.tar.xz |
x86: consolidate spinlock.h
The cli and sti instructions need to be replaced by paravirt hooks.
For the i386 architecture, this is already done. The code requirements
aren't much different from x86_64 POV, so this part is consolidated in
the common header
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h')
-rw-r--r-- | include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h | 71 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h b/include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h index d3bcebe..c42c3f1 100644 --- a/include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h +++ b/include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h @@ -5,16 +5,6 @@ #include <asm/rwlock.h> #include <asm/page.h> #include <asm/processor.h> -#include <linux/compiler.h> - -#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT -#include <asm/paravirt.h> -#else -#define CLI_STRING "cli" -#define STI_STRING "sti" -#define CLI_STI_CLOBBERS -#define CLI_STI_INPUT_ARGS -#endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT */ /* * Your basic SMP spinlocks, allowing only a single CPU anywhere @@ -27,23 +17,24 @@ * (the type definitions are in asm/spinlock_types.h) */ -static inline int __raw_spin_is_locked(raw_spinlock_t *x) +static inline int __raw_spin_is_locked(raw_spinlock_t *lock) { - return *(volatile signed char *)(&(x)->slock) <= 0; + return *(volatile signed char *)(&(lock)->slock) <= 0; } static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) { - asm volatile("\n1:\t" - LOCK_PREFIX " ; decb %0\n\t" - "jns 3f\n" - "2:\t" - "rep;nop\n\t" - "cmpb $0,%0\n\t" - "jle 2b\n\t" - "jmp 1b\n" - "3:\n\t" - : "+m" (lock->slock) : : "memory"); + asm volatile( + "\n1:\t" + LOCK_PREFIX " ; decb %0\n\t" + "jns 3f\n" + "2:\t" + "rep;nop\n\t" + "cmpb $0,%0\n\t" + "jle 2b\n\t" + "jmp 1b\n" + "3:\n\t" + : "+m" (lock->slock) : : "memory"); } /* @@ -55,7 +46,8 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) * irq-traced, but on CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS we never use this variant. */ #ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING -static inline void __raw_spin_lock_flags(raw_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags) +static inline void __raw_spin_lock_flags(raw_spinlock_t *lock, + unsigned long flags) { asm volatile( "\n1:\t" @@ -79,18 +71,20 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_lock_flags(raw_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long fla "5:\n\t" : [slock] "+m" (lock->slock) : [flags] "r" (flags) - CLI_STI_INPUT_ARGS + CLI_STI_INPUT_ARGS : "memory" CLI_STI_CLOBBERS); } #endif static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) { - char oldval; + signed char oldval; + asm volatile( "xchgb %b0,%1" :"=q" (oldval), "+m" (lock->slock) :"0" (0) : "memory"); + return oldval > 0; } @@ -112,7 +106,7 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) { - char oldval = 1; + unsigned char oldval = 1; asm volatile("xchgb %b0, %1" : "=q" (oldval), "+m" (lock->slock) @@ -139,31 +133,16 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_unlock_wait(raw_spinlock_t *lock) * * On x86, we implement read-write locks as a 32-bit counter * with the high bit (sign) being the "contended" bit. - * - * The inline assembly is non-obvious. Think about it. - * - * Changed to use the same technique as rw semaphores. See - * semaphore.h for details. -ben - * - * the helpers are in arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c */ -/** - * read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed? - * @lock: the rwlock in question. - */ -static inline int __raw_read_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *x) +static inline int __raw_read_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *lock) { - return (int)(x)->lock > 0; + return (int)(lock)->lock > 0; } -/** - * write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed? - * @lock: the rwlock in question. - */ -static inline int __raw_write_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *x) +static inline int __raw_write_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *lock) { - return (x)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS; + return (lock)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS; } static inline void __raw_read_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw) @@ -187,6 +166,7 @@ static inline void __raw_write_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw) static inline int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *lock) { atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock; + atomic_dec(count); if (atomic_read(count) >= 0) return 1; @@ -197,6 +177,7 @@ static inline int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *lock) static inline int __raw_write_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *lock) { atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock; + if (atomic_sub_and_test(RW_LOCK_BIAS, count)) return 1; atomic_add(RW_LOCK_BIAS, count); |