summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>2013-08-28 00:18:01 (GMT)
committerAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>2013-09-10 22:56:30 (GMT)
commit5cedf721a7cdb54e9222133516c916210d836470 (patch)
treead88b1e86956e75c173fe70206fa9c40d3d2a86f /include
parent3b1d58a4c96799eb4c92039e1b851b86f853548a (diff)
downloadlinux-5cedf721a7cdb54e9222133516c916210d836470.tar.xz
list_lru: fix broken LRU_RETRY behaviour
The LRU_RETRY code assumes that the list traversal status after we have dropped and regained the list lock. Unfortunately, this is not a valid assumption, and that can lead to racing traversals isolating objects that the other traversal expects to be the next item on the list. This is causing problems with the inode cache shrinker isolation, with races resulting in an inode on a dispose list being "isolated" because a racing traversal still thinks it is on the LRU. The inode is then never reclaimed and that causes hangs if a subsequent lookup on that inode occurs. Fix it by always restarting the list walk on a LRU_RETRY return from the isolate callback. Avoid the possibility of livelocks the current code was trying to avoid by always decrementing the nr_to_walk counter on retries so that even if we keep hitting the same item on the list we'll eventually stop trying to walk and exit out of the situation causing the problem. Reported-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions